ACTA will stall till Autumn, says European Commissioner
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 14 July 2010
In spite of the cloak and dagger secrecy with which the European Commission is trying to shroud its ACTA negotiators, Trade Commissioner Karel de Grucht let slip a few nuggets of information on Tuesday afternoon - including comments on 3-strikes measures.
Speaking in a hearing with the European Parliament's Civil Liberties committee, which was public, Commissioner De Grucht said that he did not expect much progress at the next round of the ACTA (Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement) negotiations - which will be in Washington in late July. And he further predicted that there was unlikely to be movement on ACTA before September.
The reason for the stalling is a difference of
opinion between the negotiating countries over the scope. Some want the ACTA to include patents and designs, others want it to be ‘just' trade marks and copyright.
On the Internet issues, De Grucht was questioned heavily by MEPs Stavros Lambrinidis and Jan Albrecht, (and one other whose name I did not quite catch).
Stavros Lambrinidis, pointing out that the devil is in the detail, pressed Commissioner De Grucht on ISP liability. He expressed the concern that ACTA may not force a 3-strikes regime but does allow it, and that under such a regime, ISPs could be obligated to follow the downloading patterns of their users.
The answer from Commissioner De Grucht was unexpected – and quite concerning. De Grucht acknowledged that a 3-strikes approach is not forbidden by ACTA, but that any implementation is down to Member State or EU law. He further said that individual member states may adopt 3-strikes measures, citing France as his example. Then he went on to say “it is not excluded that the EU would adopt legislation in this respect and that would be material legislation”.
From what I understand, the European Commission had shelved any such plans that it might have had in the wake of the Amendment 138 debate in the Telecoms Package. Unless this is a hint that something has changed.If that is the case, then it is in the public interest for it to be clarified.
De Grucht also claimed that ACTA is in line with the E-commerce directive - a view which would be difficult to substantiate if put to the test, and illustrating once again how DG Trade do not appear to understand the nature of the legal changes that ACTA could create.
Jan Albrecht asked about the Telecoms Package final agreement, to which Commissioner De Grucht did not provide an answer.
A video of the European Parliament Civil Liberties (LIBE) session on ACTA is available via this link :
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2010) ACTA will stall until Autumn, says European Commissioner , http://www.iptegrity.com 14 July 2010 .
- Article Views: 7828
IPtegrity politics
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Not a blank cheque: European Parliament consents to EU-UK Agreement
- UK border safety alert - mind the capability gap
- What? Will UK government ignore security as it walks away from EU?
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
- Copyright-style website blocking orders slipped into Online Safety Bill
- 2 billion cost to British businesses for Online Safety Bill