EU ACTA negotiator says no 3 strikes but do we believe him?
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 23 March 2010
"3-strikes is no-one's idea, no-one has ever proposed that." Will his words come to haunt Luc Devigne, EU ACTA negotiator? Can we believe what he says?
Luc Devigne, the European Commission's negotiator on the ACTA (Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement), took the hot seat yesterday as he was quizzed by NGOs and telecoms industry lobbyists about the Internet provisions this secretly negotiated IPR enforcement treaty. Speaking at the European Commission's ACTA Stakeholders' meeting, he came under under pressure from several questioners. And he insisted that ‘there will be no 3-strikes rule" In this short clip, he is under fire from Jeremie Zimmerman of La Quadrature du Net on the question of 3-strikes and ISP liability:
Right at the end of the seminar, Mr Devigne is asked again about 3-strikes. His answer
may well live to haunt him: "3-strikes is no-one's idea, no-one has ever proposed that." You can hear it at the end of this clip :
Another point which got my attention is Luc Devigne's response to Sylvie Forbin, the lobbyist for the French content company Vivendi, who is married to the former French Ambassador to the EU. Note how he smiles at her. Her question contains a hidden bullet. She asks about how ACTA will handle future technology developments. This is the big issue at the moment in the UK with the Digital Economy Bill, which includes clauses to deal with such 'future technology developments'. This is rights-holder code for a catch-all clause with a right to block websites and/or to alter the law at any time without scrutiny. Beware!!
Sylvie Forbin's question is in the middle of this clip:
Also worth a look:
Joe McNamee of European Digital Rights asks about ISP liability and whether Devigne will respect the Parliament's Resolution to limit ACTA to counterfeit only.
Devigne refuses to answer this question, and does so again when it is repeated by Erik Josefsson, adviser to the Green group. Incidentally, if you watch the clip, Devigne does cite the wrong number of the clause in the Resolution. Clause 9 Calls on the Commission to continue the negotiations on ACTA and limit them to the existing European IPR enforcement system against counterfeiting.
Devigne reminds me of George Bush senior, in 1988, when he made the pre-election promise which he was not able to keep: Read my lips, no new taxes .After being elected, he did put up taxes.
Devigne will not be able to keep his promise either.
**For further reporting on the European Commission's ACTA Stakeholder meeting, Michael Geist clarifies the matter of ISP liability and ACTA
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2010) EU ACTA negotiator: Read my lips - no 3 strikes http://www.iptegrity.com 23 March 2010- Article Views: 8153
IPtegrity politics
- Why would the UK take on Apple?
- What's influencing tech policy in 2025?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?