EU Parliament's Kangaroo Group hops onto ACTA
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 09 October 2011
Whose pouch does the European Parliament sit in?
The European Parliament's notorious Kangaroo Group is getting stuck in to intellectual property rights enforcement policy this autumn. The Kangaroo Group's working group on copyright and IPR matters - the forum on intellectual property, counterfeit, contraband & organised crime - will host a lunch next week entitled "FACTS ABOUT ACTA". It will be an opportunity for rights-holder lobbyists to bend the ears of MEPs and plead for ACTA in a quiet side-room of the European Parliament. Topping the speakers list is Marielle Gallo, the French Sarkozy-ite, pro-rights-holder MEP. At her side will be
Pedro Velasco Martins, one of the EU's ACTA (anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement) negotiators, plus the Swedish Justice Ministry director, Stefan Johansson, who negotiated on ACTA for the EU Presidency.
The ACTA lunch is hosted by UK MEP Bill Newton-Dunn. According to the invitation, it will be held in a private room within the Parliament building, and there is a charge of €15 for MEPs, and €50 for everyone else.
The title of the working group - forum on intellectual property, counterfeit, contraband & organised crime - gives a fairly strong clue as its orientation. The pricing of the lunch gives another clue as to who benefits the most from it.
The inclusion of a Mr Johannson as a speaker has prompted the Swedish MEP, Carl Schlyter, to ask questions back home. He has written to Sweden's Justice Ministry, asking why it is participating in Kangaroo Group activities.
The Kangaroo Group is one of a number of groups which provide extra-curricula contact between corporate industry lobbyists and MEPs. It has been criticised for being a back-door entry point for lobbyists from the arms industry. In particular, the Working Group on Space, Defence and Security has been accused by a Brussels-based NGO which monitors lobbying in the EU, of being a channel for arms industry lobbyists to shape EU defence policy.
The lunch, and any other meetings hosted by the Kangaroo Group are of course non-legislative, and outside of any Parliamentary process, and as such, they could be considered not very significant. However, the group arguably provides privileged access to MEPs who will take on influential policy-making roles.
The September lunch speaker for this working group was the European Commission head honcho on intellectual property Margot Frohlinger. She was an appropriate choice. Last Spring, Mrs Frohlinger ordered a kangaroo closure* on a series of Commisson-hosted talks about online enforcement which were taking place in secret - or rather, she threw her handbag at the telecoms industry lobbyists, because they did not want to co-operate.
The long list of corporate members of the European Parliament Kangaroo Group includes all the large automobile manfuacurers, pharmaceutical companies, banks, luxury goods firm Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessey (LVMH), entertainment company NBC Universal, tobacco companies Phillip Morris and BAT. MEPs in the Kangaroo Group include Hungary's Edit Hercog, Germany's Paul Rubig, and France's Phillipe Juvin.
The NGO, Corporate Europe Observatory, has written to the European Parliamentary authorities,asking why the Kangaroo Group gets the use of European Parliament facilities on a regular basis.
Do Kangaroo Group lunches serve Moet champagne, I wonder?
*where the chair of a committee orders certain topics to be excluded.
Please attribute this article: Monica Horten (2011) EU Parliament's Kangaroo group hops onto ACTA http://www.iptegrity.com 10 October 2011 .
- Article Views: 21015
IPtegrity politics
- Shadow bans: EU law says users may not be left in the dark
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Not a blank cheque: European Parliament consents to EU-UK Agreement
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Shadow bans: EU law says users may not be left in the dark
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
- Copyright-style website blocking orders slipped into Online Safety Bill