EU Parliament Trade committee says no to ACTA
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 21 June 2012
The EU Parliament is now on track to reject ACTA (Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement), following todays vote in the International Trade committee today. The vote follows 4 other committees that also voted to reject it. On the INTA committee, 31 MEPs voted
in total, 19 in favour of rejection, 12 against. This means that the recommendation to the whole Parliament - the plenary - will be rejection. Technically, it will decline consent to ACTA. An amendment proposing postponement of the plenary vote until after the ECJ ruling, was rejected.
The whole European Parliament is expected to vote on ACTA on 4th July. However, the result is by no means a foregone conclusion. A study of past votes on copyright - notably the Telecoms Package - tells us that events can intervene.
A rejection of ACTA will set the Parliament against the Commission, in an inter-institutional argument that has been brewing ever since the Parliament started work on ACTA. Yesterday, the Trade Commissioner made a last-ditch attempt to persuade the committee in favour of post-ponement - see EU Parliament: we will not be pushed, Mr DeGucht!
After the vote, the rapporteur, David Martin, was surrounded by television crews, indicating the level of political importance that ACTA - and the Internet copyright issue - has now attained in the European Parliament.
For the story of what happened in the Telecoms Package, see my book. The Copyright Enforcement Enigma
This is an original article from Iptegrity.com. You may re-publish it under a Creative Commons licence, but you should cite my name and provide a link back to iptegrity.com. Media and Academics - please cite asMonica Horten, EU Parliament Trade committee says no to ACTA www.iptegrity.com, 21 June 2012 . Commercial users - please contact me
- Article Views: 18696
IPtegrity politics
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Not a blank cheque: European Parliament consents to EU-UK Agreement
- UK border safety alert - mind the capability gap
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
- Copyright-style website blocking orders slipped into Online Safety Bill
- 2 billion cost to British businesses for Online Safety Bill