Lex AT&T? EU Commisson's TTIP proposal to revise telecoms law
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 04 March 2014
Part 1 of a series of 3 postings on the leaked EU TTIP discussion document
The European Union could give away unlimited rights to foreign telecoms companies to buy up rivals in Europe as part of the proposed new transatlantic trade deal (TTIP). This is one of an astonishing set of proposals revealed in a Commission document leaked by the German newspaper Die Zeit last week. The leaked document further indicates a possible re-write of the EU telecoms framework, outlining a 'mini' version of the EU Telecoms Package for discussion.
The document made public by Zeit Online is a leaked European Commission proposal for 'trade in services, investment and e-commerce'. The document is intended to provide the basis for discussion in the negotiations with the United States over the trade agreement known as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP).
Buried within this document, barely attracting any notice unless one is familiar with EU telecoms law, is a series of Articles that mimic the structure of the EU Telecoms Package. They address regulatory structures and powers (Framework directive), authorisation, access and interconnection, (as per directives of the same name - to find out more about them see my book The Copyright Enforcement Enigma Internet Politics and the Telecoms Package.
Without a full analysis that would take a considerable time to carry out, it is unclear what the precise implications of these proposals would be. But it would seem that they form the skeleton of a re-work of the current law.
This trade agreement therefore, is not just about import-export, but it concerns, at least in part, the re-writing of laws for telecoms service provision. In that regard, it's also about re-writing laws for the Internet.
We know that the EU telecoms framework governs Internet service providers, and hence it governs the Internet in Europe. Based on the 2009 Telecoms Package, and the current proposal for a Telecoms Regulation (Connected Continent), we know how telecoms law can be manipulated to serve large corporate interests not only in the telecoms industry itself, but in other industries such as entertainment.
We assume that the re-write will have to suit the US industry interests who will be lobbying the US Trade Representative ( to find out how they lobby, see A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms chapter 3).
Sitting quietly veiled and peeping out of this structure is a new bombshell. It concerns foreign investment in the telecoms infrastructure.
Article 50: Foreign shareholding
With regard to the provision of electronic communication services and networks through commercial presence, no Party shall impose joint venture requirements or limit the participation of foreign capital in terms of maximum percentage limit on foreign shareholding or the total value of individual or aggregate foreign investment.
There is no such provision that I can find in the current telecoms framework, and one has to ask why it would be needed under the TTIP trade agreement?
If I understand it correctly, it is seeking to open up investment in EU telecoms companies, by removing any limits on the level of investment.
In other words, this TTIP proposal would permit US companies to invest in EU telecoms providers without limiting the share they may take. It could allow a free rein to US telecoms companies operating in Europe.
It is public knowledge that AT&T wanted to buy Vodafone, although it has backed off for the moment, following the NSA scandal and the lack of trust in US companies which would make it less likely for such a deal to be approved.
It is unclear is whether this clause in TTIP would make any difference to a company like AT&T investing in European telecoms, and in what way?
More transparency is needed on TTIP process, and in particular, details of why it is necessary to use this process to re-work the Telecoms Package behind closed doors. Most especially because MEPs in the European Parliament are about to vote on a related European Commission proposal - the Telecoms Regulation or Proposal for a Connected Continent. If - and it's still an 'if' - the Connected Continent is voted - how would the TTIP proposal fit with it and would it seek to override it?
Read the article in Die Zeit - EU will laut Geheimdokument Sonderrechte f?r Konzerne
If you are interested in EU-US trade relations and intellectual property or copyright, you might like my book A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
---
This is an original article from Iptegrity.com and reflects research that I have carried out. If you refer to it or to its content, please cite my name as the author, and provide a link back to iptegrity.com. Media and Academics - please cite as Monica Horten, 2013, Lex AT&T? EU Commisson's TTIP proposal to revise telecoms law, in Iptegrity.com 3 March 2014. Commercial users - please contact me.
Tags: EU-US trade agreement, TTIP, telecoms regulation, connected continent, Telecoms Package, telecoms reform package, EU telecoms, AT&T, Vodafone, telecoms framework, telecoms law, Internet governance.
- Article Views: 29526
IPtegrity politics
- Why would the UK take on Apple?
- What's influencing tech policy in 2025?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?