Stevenson & Clement (2010) Regulatory Lessons for Internet Traffic Management
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 16 January 2011
Regulatory Lessons for Internet Traffic Management from Japan, the European Union and the United States: Towards Equity, Neutrality and Transparency
By John Harris Stevenson and Andrew Clement, University of Toronto (2010)
In Global Media Journal (Canadian edition) Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 9-29
Concerns were also raised about the use of deep packet inspection for commercial advertising targeting, and by computer security firms, by the Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, which advises the European Union on privacy matters (Horten, 2009, February 19).
Citation: Horten, Monica. (2009, February 19) Privacy watchdog condemns traffic data amendment. IpTegrity.com. Retrieved February 7, 2009,
Proposed amendments to existing European telecom legalisation, EU Directive 2002/22/EC concerning “universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks”, were considered by the European Parliament in 2009. These amendments, popularly called “the Telecom Package 2009”, contained a number of recommendations dealing specifically with network management. These included provisions “to prevent degradation of service and hindering or slowing of traffic over networks”, and encouraging or mandating national regulators to establish minimum quality levels and provide up-to-date information for consumers concerning their QoS practices (European Union, 2009, December 18). Some amendments, designed to ensure that users’ access to particular types of content or applications were not unreasonably restricted, were opposed by telecommunications providers (Horten, 2009, February 16).
Citation: Horten, Monica. (2009, February 16) Harbouring compromises in the Telecoms Package. IpTegrity.com. Retrieved February 7, 2009,
- Article Views: 16328
IPtegrity politics
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Online Safety
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?