Beware as Mandelson sneaks in new web blocking clause
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 30 March 2010
Lord Mandelson, who is putting through the protectionist Digital Economy Bill on behalf of the wealthy creative industry corporations, has come out with a revised version of the BPI's website blocking clause. But beware, because this is merely a ruse to get 3-strikes carried when it goes before the House of Commons next week.
The Clause is not substantially different from the one proposed by Lord Clement-Jones and Lord Howard of Rising. All it seems to do is to create another layer of legislation, and possibly it could have two effects: one is that Mandelson is trying to get the rest of the Digital Economy bill passed before the election, so this is a ruse to leave out the most controversial clause. And, in putting it off until the political heat is also off, he can sneak it through more easily.
This clause will enable courts to order the blocking of websites. It is based on an original amendment written by the BPI (British Recorded Music Industry). It is intended to give the government a catch-all to deal with the next developement after P2P and YouTube - any new application which may be used to circulate music and film.
Lord Mandelson has written a letter of explanation to the two opposition parties, which sounds very reasonable, but given that he is spin-meister general for the government, should we believe him?
According to Linx , my interpretation would be correct. The Clause needs EU approval because it is altering our law in respect of technical standardsm. The EU requires 3 mnths notice. If Mandelson left Clause 18 in the Digital Economy Bill, opponents of the Bill would have an easy way to knock out the entire Bill. Therefore, he has left it out. He will bring it back in 3 months time, if he is still in office, having given the required notice to the EU.
All he has done is avoid an obvious legal challenge for non-compliance with an EU regulation, which would have brought the whole Bill down.
We know that the BPI are already counting on a lazy and corrupt Parliament rubber-stamping the Bill.
Here is the revised Clause 18 of the Digital Economy Bill .
Here is Lord Mandelson's letter to opposition spokesman Jeremy Hunt (who incidentally, will be facing the BPI's own Richard Mollett as the opposing Labour candidate in his South-wet Surrey constituency - see my previous article).
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2010) Beware as Mandelson sneaks in new web blocking clause http://www.iptegrity.com 31 March 2010
- Article Views: 7335
IPtegrity politics
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Not a blank cheque: European Parliament consents to EU-UK Agreement
- UK border safety alert - mind the capability gap
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
- Copyright-style website blocking orders slipped into Online Safety Bill
- 2 billion cost to British businesses for Online Safety Bill