British music industry in secret talks with ISPs
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 24 June 2008
'Broadband settlement' being negotiated behind closed doors
Talks between the British music industry and the ISPs to resolve the P2P / free downloads logjam have been going on secretly for the past 2-3 weeks, it emerged today. It is not clear exactly what kind of deal is anticipated, but it is believed that some kind of levy on ISP subscriptions is on the table, under the banner of a 'broadband settlement'. And there are indications that the British music industry is not going to push for French-style enforcement involving cutting off people's internet access. If that is the case - which remains to be seen, these talks could be positive.
The existence of the talks became evident at the Music Publishers Association AGM in London today, where management of the composers and authors collecting societies and music publishers gathered to review the financial performance of this sector of the industry for 2007. They appear to have begun about 2-3 weeks ago, and were presented as a change of heart by the ISP industry, that it is now willing to talk. A timeframe of the next 3-4 weeks to reach a conclusion has been suggested, but not confirmed.
Feargal Sharkey, chief executive of British Music Rights, confirmed that the talks are happening, but refused
to say more. When pressed to say whether a French-style graduated response was on the table, he stated emphatically that British Music rights policy does not endorse termination of user's internet accounts.
Comments from the panel discussion which took up the second half of the AGM, indicated that the talks are in direct response to the British government's threats to legislate, and they appear to involve the levy concept.
Andy Heath, chairman of British Music Rights and a board member of the Music publishers Association, said that some ISPs are re-inventing the value chain. He foresees that online royalties for music composers and publishers could grow 7-fold in the next two years, with ISP agreements in place. There was some discussion about how much the levy should be - obviously an area of contention, because it could bring in a much-welcomed injection of funds to the beleaguered music industry, but if is it set too low, there is little to gain. 'If it was the right number I'd take it, but stand back for 10 years of internicine war! " said Mr Heath.
The subject of enforcement of copyright was conspicuous by its absence at this event - it was not raised, in spite of a long panel discussion about P2P downloads and new business models. The overall atmosphere was one of forward-thinking, and presented a refreshing change from the relentless attacks on downloading from the record companies and IFPI - and their refusal to come to terms with change.
The hope is that this is a positive signal, but there is still a long way to go. Until we know more about what's on the agenda behind those closed doors in the music industry's Soho offices, we will reserve judgement.
- Article Views: 9539
IPtegrity politics
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?