DE Act delays prompt fresh 'voluntary' talks
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 21 June 2013
It is now obvious that the implementation of the copyright infringement measures in the UK's Digital Economy Act has been delayed. But it seems that the rights-holders are becoming impatient. The question is whether their impatience will get them what they want.
By now we should have seen Ofcom's final Code of Practice to implement the first part of the Digital economy Act. It hasn't appeared, and that has to be taken as an indication of some kind of problem. Ofcom did have a deadline of March this year, which it has clearly missed.
The industry grapevine is now suggesting that this delay will continue for a while. We will not see any notices going under under the DE Act copyright measures until at least 2016. That is, after the next general election.
In response, it seem the rights-holders have been putting pressure on. They are asking once again for voluntary talks with Internet Service Providers (ISPs). Meetings between the two sides have already begun. It's understood that the UK's largest ISPs have come to the table.
It's not clear whether the talks are being hosted by the government, or if they are private discussions held outside of government offices.
But it does seem that these are separate from the another set of talks to pressure the ISPs into censoring the Internet for 'parental control' purposes, that have been hosted by the Culture Secretary and mother, Maria Miller.
It probably should not be a surprise that the rights-holders might levy this kind of pressure on ISPs, since it was already known that they are getting cold feet about the costs of the DE Act. Following court orders that removed the ISP's liability for the costs for Ofcom and the appeals procedure, and heaped them onto the rights-holders, the DE Act measures are starting to look rather expensive.
However, previous 'voluntary' talks between ISPs and rights-holders on copyright enforcement have a history of failure, in the UK and in Brussels ( see Commission slams the lid on EU Hadopi talks ) . We wait with interest, on the outcome.
For the politics of the UK's copyright enforcement law, known as the Digital Eoncomy Act, see my forthcoming book A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
This is an original article from Iptegrity.com and reflects research that I have carried out. If you refer to it or to its content, please cite my name as the author, and provide a link back to iptegrity.com. Media and Academics - please cite as Monica Horten, 2013, DE Act delays prompt fresh 'voluntary' talks, in iptegrity.com, 21 June 2013. Commercial users - please contact me.
- Article Views: 21133
IPtegrity politics
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Not a blank cheque: European Parliament consents to EU-UK Agreement
- UK border safety alert - mind the capability gap
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
- Copyright-style website blocking orders slipped into Online Safety Bill
- 2 billion cost to British businesses for Online Safety Bill