Digital Economy Act & civil liberties: can Clegg push Cameron?
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 08 May 2010
Civil liberties...the UK election ...and the Digital Economy Act. Can the Liberal Democrats use the Digital Economy Act as one of their bargaining chips in their deal with the Conservatives to form the new UK government?
Following the UK election on Thursday, which gave none of the political parties a clear majority, negotiations are now taking place between the Conservatives - who gained the largest number of seats - and the Liberal Democrats - who hold the balance of seats between the Conservatives and Labour.
David Cameron has stated that one policy issue where the Conservatives and LibDems have common ground is civil liberties. He cites their mutual opposition to Labour's ID card scheme.
However, as iptegrity readers will know there is another major civil liberties issue raging in the background, which the LibDems have understood and the Conservatives have not.
These issues concern the Digital Economy Act and the reversal of a principle of justice which has existed in England since the Magna Carta, namely the presumption of innocence and the right to a fair trial. Mr Clegg's advisors will be able to obtain full details of this issue from their Liberal colleagues in the European Parliament who fought for it in the Telecoms Package in November last year. In particular, their
Swedish colleague, Lena Ek would be able to explain it to them.
In brief, the measures to support copyright by acting against Internet users are intended to bypass the court system. The EU Telecoms Package contains a clause which seeks to ensure that such a bypass cannot happen. In the process of the Telecoms Package through the EU legislature there was considerable public debate surrounding this issue, and it is well-known in Brussels.
Moreover, those who understand technology and the Internet are only too painfully aware that the implementation of such measures, as proposed under the Digital Economy Act, stands to create a technical infrastructure capable of censorship, and the measures could easily be misappropriated for censorship purposes.
The Digital Economy Act was put in place as a protectionist measure for the large and wealthy entertainment industries. Mr Cameron admitted before the election, in the YouTube Facebook leaders debate , that he could have blocked the Digital Economy Actl. (The Digital Economy Bill was rammed through the British Parliament on 6 April, and gained royal assent with indecent haste on 8 April)
The reason he did not do so was to support the "good bits" which were "important" for the music and entertainment industries. My feeling is that he was never briefed on the civil liberties issues. The reason may be that the collusion with Labour and corporate industry goes back to the European Parliament and the Telecoms Package. The UK Conservatives in the European Parliament singularly failed to address the civi liberties issues and in the end were out-voted.
Assuming that the LibDems can convince Mr Cameron of the serious civil liberties issues at stake, what then do they ask for? A repeal of the Act? A stay of execution - blocking the Ofcom discussions?
For more information on the EU Telecoms Package and the civil liberties issues, please see the Telecoms Package sections on iptegrity.com
In my section Copyright Business I am starting to track the wealth that is retained in these industries.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2010) Digital Economy Act: can Clegg push Cameron? http://www.iptegrity.com 8 May 2010
- Article Views: 7048
IPtegrity politics
- Shadow bans: EU law says users may not be left in the dark
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Not a blank cheque: European Parliament consents to EU-UK Agreement
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Shadow bans: EU law says users may not be left in the dark
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
- Copyright-style website blocking orders slipped into Online Safety Bill