UK Minister says website blocking proposals "imminent"
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 08 February 2012
The British government is about to unveil proposals to block the Internet for copyright enforcement purposes. The confirmation came in a Parliamentary debate yesterday on Intellectual Property, in which pro-copyright MPs had a little 'chit-chat' about the allegedly 'anti-copyright' government, and indicated their desire for the activation of the Digital Economy Act.
The Minister of State for Business, Mark Prisk, said that an announcement on website blocking for copyright enforcement is "imminent". He did not give any detail, but did hint that the proposals would be 'welcome'.
Given the forum in which he was making the statement (see below), the word 'welcome' should be interpreted from the perspective of the copyright industries, and could include measures targeting Google and search engines.
The proposals have been under development for at least six months by the telecoms regulator, Ofcom, and the Department of Culture, Media and Sport. They have been expected for the past couple of weeks, according to Parliamentary insiders. It is possible that they will take the form of a Green Paper, the first step to legislation.
Mark Prisk's actual words were:
"We need an IP system that helps business and consumers to realise all the opportunities presented, which is why we are actively supporting the UK's creators and the creative industries and why, to benefit creators, we voted in Europe to extend the term of protection for sound recordings from 50 to 70 years?a really important step for originators of music and other sound recordings. It is also why [...]we pressed to introduce measures to tackle online infringement of copyright through the Digital Economy Act 2010."
"we are closely considering the issue around the blocking access, whether to block access to websites that infringe copyright. We will have something to say about that shortly, but, as I would like to continue to have a positive working relationship with my ministerial colleagues in the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, I shall not pre-empt what they are about to say. An announcement is imminent, and I think that it will be welcomed."
Mr Prisk seems to have forgotten that it was the Labour government - now the opposition - which pressed for the extension of copyright term protection, and it was Labour who pressed for the Digital Economy Act ( see DE Bill rammed through UK Parliament in 2 hours ).
The question which prompted the Minister's answer, was put by the Labour MP for Newcastle, Chi Onwurah. She is currently shadow Minister for Business. Under the previous administration, until May 2010, Ms Onwurah was head of telecoms technology, at Ofcom.
She spoke in favour of anti-downloading measures, and in support of the Digital Economy Act.
The debate was instigated by the Scottish Nationalist MP, Pete Wishart. Mr Wishart is himself a musician and an open friend of the BPI. In his opening remarks, he bragged about having a ticket to the Brit Awards, the show-biz highlight of the music industry year.
What was interesting about this debate is how Mr Wishart launched an attack Google, before turning his verbal weaponry onto the Intellectual Property Office and the IP Minister, Baroness Wilcox, as well as Consumer Focus. He accused the government, and the IPO of giving too much support to IT industry lobbyists, and even that they are "anti-copyright".
Mr Wishart further claimed the music industry are being dismissed by government Ministers whose ears are being bent by Google. He came close to suggesting that Google could have dominated the Hargreaves review, and only just refrained from the suggestion that Downing Street is in the pockets of Google.
"Those who now have the Government's ear are not particularly helpful. Some have become self-serving protectionists and are telling the Government their views. Self-appointed digital rights champions seem to rule the roost when informing Government opinion, and everything that the Government do is predicated on the support for and desire to please massive multi-billion dollar west-coast United States companies such as Google."
In respect of the music industry not getting sufficient 'ear time', Mr Wishart's assertion carries little weight. But his attack may indicate that fear is building in the Berners Street headquarters of the UK music industry.
I trust Mr Wishart and his colleagues will enjoy the Brit Awards. No doubt, this event provides a wonderful opportunity for aging MPs to mingle with bright young boy and girl bands, in the expectation that some of the glamour rubs off. But it would be very disconcerting if the Brit Awards were to become a venue for policy-making.
We await the government's web blocking announcement with interest. Perhaps Mr Prisk's memory will return too.
Source: Hansard, 7 February 2012.
You may re-publish my article under a Creative Commons licence, but you should cite my name and provide a link back to iptegrity.com. Media and Academics - please cite as Monica Horten, UK Minister says web blocking proposals "imminent", www.iptegrity.com 6 February 2012 . Commercial users - please contact me.
- Article Views: 77077
IPtegrity politics
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Not a blank cheque: European Parliament consents to EU-UK Agreement
- UK border safety alert - mind the capability gap
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
- Copyright-style website blocking orders slipped into Online Safety Bill
- 2 billion cost to British businesses for Online Safety Bill