UK politicians try to lever open ACTA
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 07 February 2010
Tom Watson and Don Foster have placed calls in the UK Parliament for information on the ACTA . But are they asking the right questions?
The UK Member of Parliament Tom Watson, who is courageously opposing his own party on the issue of copyright enforcment, has asked in Parliament for information on the ACTA process. ACTA is a proposed international agreement which will impose new copyright enforcement measures onto Internet users worldwide, and it has serious implications for civil liberties and freedom of speech.
Questioning one of the Ministers from the Department of
Business, Innovation and Skills, David Lammy, he asked if the UK would try to get agreement from the other ACTA participants to release the latest draft.
The answer he got was worthy of ‘Yes Minister' as Lammy on the one hand said he would ‘seek transparency' and on the other that ‘it is not the practice in trade negotiations' to disclose material.
Note that Lammy said last year that the UK would not cut off Internet users - widely reported in the media - and yet his colleague only last week said in the House of Lords that ‘we are agreed on a graduated response' . Users will get warnings before they are cut off. ( See Lord Young of Norwood Green in the Digital Economy Bill house of Lords committee stage, col. 1308).
Anyway, Lammy is not the Minister to ask. He is Minister for Intellectual Property. The ACTA-style copyright enforcement measures for the UK are in the Digital Economy Bill, which amends the Communications Act, and is being steered by Lord Mandelson. It is co-sponsored by Ben Bradshaw of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
The Minister who was to pilot the Digital Economy bill through the House of Commons, Sion Simon, will be standing down as an MP and therefore will no longer take on this responsibility.
Don Foster , of the LibDems has tabled an Early Day Motion on ACTA . He is concerned that ACTA may force us to re-write the Digital Economy Bill.Early Day Motions are non-legislative, but if they get sufficient signatures, they may obtain a Parliamentary debate on the topic.
Unfortunately, ACTA will not stop anything that the UK government is trying to do. The UK proposals for copyright enforcement in the mis-named Digital Economy Bill, have the full support of the rights-holder industries and will not be over-ridden by ACTA.
The real question is whether the UK is more draconian than ACTA?
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2010) UK politicians try to lever open ACTA http://www.iptegrity.com 6 February 2010
- Article Views: 8417
IPtegrity politics
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?