What is a serious failure of an Internet registry?
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 04 February 2010
Digital Economy Bill: Nominet provisions. Should the government be able to step in and take over the Internet domain registry? If so, under what conditions?
The final stages of the House of Lords examination of the Digital Economy Bill saw their lordships arguing over a clause which will give the government the power to take over the Internet domain registry in cases where there has been a "serious failure" .
The government wants the provision (in Clause 18) because the Internet is now so important for the UK economy. One would asssume that the concern relates to the management of the domain servers by the registry, and ensuring that they do not become sloppy resulting in network failures for consumers downstream. However, the government has not specified that
purpose and the concern is that it could abuse the power to take over the running of the Internet.
Lord Lucas and the Earl of Errol were concerned that commercial interests could put pressure on the government to take over a registry to support their business needs.
Lord de Mauley (Conservative) asked what is "serious"? The definition in the Bill only says that it must harm the reputation of the network operator, or harm the interests of consumers. He called for the Bill to include an obligation for the government to consult on this matter, such that it cannot be used as an arbitrary measure.
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative) asked whether this was nationalisation of the domain registry, because the provision specifies the right for the government to appoint a manager to take over the registry. Domain registries are private companies under UK law, and one concern is that once the government has its own ‘manager' to take over from the company directors, he could potentially interfere with other parts of the company operations. .
The government said that it would be a reserve power only, and only used in extreme situations. It accepted amendments to ensure that the clause only affects domains which are clearly linked to the UK economy, and not to non-UK web domains. The main registry affected will be Nominet, which runs the .co.uk domain.
The question is whether the government should have the right to take over what is effectively a part of the essential infrastructure for an industry. I wonder if there are any precedents to this. Can the government step in and take over a key institution in the banking industry, or the energy sector?
The debate on Clause 18 Internet domain registry provisions is available online.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2010) What is a serious failure of an Internet registry? http://www.iptegrity.com 4 February 2010
- Article Views: 7587
IPtegrity politics
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?