Europarl comes together on music licencing
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 04 February 2014
Eight years after the EU first began working on music online, the European Parliament this morning adopted a new directive to regulate music collecting societies. MEPs came to a political agreement that the transparency and administration of collecting societies should be regulated in order to improve the flow of money to artists. They also recognised that cross-border licencing had to be addressed in order to enable pan-European online music services.
This is the Collective Rights Management directive, which, if it works as intended, will radically overhaul the collecting societies. MEPs found that collecting societies in their current form, frequently demonstrate poor cash management and fail to account propertly to artists. Some, as noted in the Parliament, have been hauled up for corrupt practices (see for example Spanish police raid copyright society in fraud probe ).
On that basis the new directive provides rules for the internal and inter-organisational administration of the collecting societies, with the aim of facilitating faster and more accurate payments to artists.
At the same time, the new directive is intended to regulate how collecting societies deal with their commercial clients which include online music service providers. This is important because of key role of collecting societies, frequently overlooked, is that of gatekeeper. Without their co-operation, it is difficult if not impossible for online content providers to offer music.
In that context, cross-border licencing in Europe has been a particular problem. Currently, anyone wanting to offer music legally, has to deal with 28 separate collecting societies in each member state. This is clearly impossible, especially when the evidence shows that some do not even know what repertoire they represent. The new directive is intended to address that issue, by making it possible for artists and clients to deal just with one single collective rights management organisation (as the collecting societies will now be known).
The rapporteur on the Collective Rights Management directive was the French MEP Marielle Gallo, known for her rights-holder sympathies. However, in this instance, MEPs came together on this directive because all recognised the problem of poor management within collecting societies and the need to do something about it. This created a common ground on which all - EPP, Socialists, Liberals, Greens, ECR and the Pirate Party - were able to agree. Mrs Gallo rather understated things when she said this was "'excellent co-operation" on such a "sensitive issue". Quite an astonishing feat. Let's hope it works.
This is an original article from Iptegrity.com and reflects research that I have carried out. If you refer to it or to its content, please cite my name as the author, and provide a link back to iptegrity.com. Media and Academics - please cite as Monica Horten, 2014, Europarl comes together on music licencing, in Iptegrity.com 4 February 2014. Commercial users - please contact me.
If you're interested in copyright politics, you might like my new book A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
- Article Views: 14939
IPtegrity politics
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Not a blank cheque: European Parliament consents to EU-UK Agreement
- UK border safety alert - mind the capability gap
- What? Will UK government ignore security as it walks away from EU?
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
- Copyright-style website blocking orders slipped into Online Safety Bill
- 2 billion cost to British businesses for Online Safety Bill