IFPI accuses telcos of filibustering
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 14 May 2008
Report on European Commission High Level Conference on Counterfeiting and Piracy 13 May 2008
John Kennedy, chairman of the International Federation of Phonographic Industries (IFPI), has accused the telcos and ISPs of filibustering and avoiding coming to the table to discuss co-operation measures with the music industry. His attack was delivered during an event organised by the European Commission to discuss policy issues related to online piracy and counterfeited goods.
Mr Kennedy said that he first called on the ISPs at a conference organised by ETNO (European Telecommunications Network Operators Association) in 2005, and "three years later, there has been little or no action from the
telcos. The best tactic they employ is to filibuster." he said. He continued to pour scorn on them saying they only act in their own self-interest, making the claim that "all major ISPs throttle P2P traffic when it suits their business" and complaining that they won't help his industry by cutting off people who infringe copyright: "these companies help themselves when it suits them".
Simon Milner, speaking for BT, countered by asking where the customer interest was in this debate: "we haven't heard much about the customer today. A lot of data is private to the individual and we must not treat it as public data." And he added "If we cut off an account because of one person, what about the others in the household? It is unacceptable in this day and age to cut off people's broadband service".
But Mr Kennedy held up a stark choice - it's either filtering or litigatation. Describing his view of filtering "it gives the ISPs a gatekeeping role, not policing" , he added tellingly "surely its better than litigation" . What he seemed to be saying was that either the ISPs, and the policy-makers, meet his requests, or IFPI will ramp up litigation against the ISP's customers in cases of alleged copyright infringement. Is this a smoking gun?
On the French Olivennes proposals, he commented "our industry has to thank Sarkozy for his ground-breaking agreement...we look to the EU to capitalise on the momentum created by Olivennes". Bearing in mind that this was an EU policy-forming event, such comments take on greater significance and will concern the many who do not agree with the Olivennes proposals.
It was certainly refreshing to hear BT standing up for the customer - and the public interest - and given that the general tone of the conference seemed to be decidely pro-enforcement ( a little worrying), Mr Milner was in a difficult spot.
But was the IFPI chairman just a little more rattled than he let on? His speech delivery was hurried and dense, more akin to what one would expect from someone new to public speaking, not an accomplished communicator like Mr Kennedy.
- Article Views: 9217
IPtegrity politics
- What's influencing tech policy in 2025?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?