Viviane Reding: new EU laws must pass rights test
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 12 January 2010
Viviane Reding, European Commissioner-designate for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship has promised to protect the rights of individual citizens.
Mrs Reding made it clear that following ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, all new EU laws will have to be checked for compliance with the Charter of Fundamental rights. It will be her role to ensure that it happens.
She was answering questions from Members of the European Parliament, as part of a vetting process before she can be appointed to her new role. Given that the large number of MEPs in attendance, this was, if you like, a very public job interview.
In answer to a question from
MEP Stavros Lambrinidis on the requirement for the need for consent before companies can use data obtained from Internet users, Mrs Reding responded that action will be taken when the right to privacy is not observed. She highlighted the case of the UK company, Phorm, which was using users data for advertising purposes, and against which she took action in her previous role as Information Society Commissioner.
On the matter of sanctions, (of any sort) she said they will have to be proportionate o the policy goal. Policy, she said, should be driven not by fear, but by values.
On another question regarding privacy from MEP Sophia InT'Veld, Mrs Reding noted that the Data Retention Directive was pushed through by the Council of Interior Ministers (sic) against the will of the Commission and the responsible committee in the Parliament. She said she hoped the Parliament would think first before taking such a decision in the future.
In response to a suggestion that she is too cosy with industry, she said that the telecoms industry were 'not very happy with me on the basis of the roaming regulation' - which reduced the cost of roamed mobile phone calls to consumers.
Interestingly, she said that fundamental rights will have to be implemented in both contract and consumer law.
She did not say so, but it's worth pointing out that this has implications for graduated response measures which are implemented via contract law.
One other matter will give her an interesting conundrum - Article 17.2 of the Charter is the right to intellectual property. She did not comment on that.
The video of the full session with Mrs Reding in the European Parliament will be re-run tomorrow. The questioning was much wider than just the Internet, and she answered questions on a range of issues across the full spectrum of rights.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2010) Viviane Reding: new EU laws must pass rights test , http://www.iptegrity.com 12 January 2010 .
- Article Views: 14530
IPtegrity politics
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Not a blank cheque: European Parliament consents to EU-UK Agreement
- UK border safety alert - mind the capability gap
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
- Copyright-style website blocking orders slipped into Online Safety Bill
- 2 billion cost to British businesses for Online Safety Bill