America ups the ante on ACTA - via the G8
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 12 April 2012
The US government is not happy about ACTA, and is already taking steps to introduce what it really wants by another back door. In a document leaked today by the European Digital Rights group (EDRi), a new plan for intellectual property enforcement is revealed. Where ACTA was vague, the new plan is explicit.
The new G8 plan for IP enforcement includes the extended shopping list of Internet blocking measures, via payment providers, advertisers and search engines as well as individual websites. According to EDRi, the proposal may have been prepared by law enforcement working groups.
Interestingly, the G8 proposal introduces some new language. It never mentions the Internet. Instead it talks about 'voluntary best practices' and 'protecting the global supply chain'. Its overt focus is on counterfeit medicines and online pharmacies. But the generality of the language implies a wider application.
The G8 enforcement proposal appears in a plain paper document headed 'Non-paper on Intellectual property rights protection'. It has three sub-headings, which include 'G8 inititiative to support voluntary best practices for securing global supply chains'. The components of the supply chains are named as 'shippers, payment processors, ad brokers, advertisers, and similar stakeholders'.
Note the deliberate avoidance of the word 'Internet service provider'. However, in the world of e-commerce, the ISP is implied.
It's also notable that the proposed G8 IP enforcement measures mirror those in the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and Protect IP ACT. The language of 'voluntary best practice' has also been taken from United States government policy documents. It is certainly quite unlike any language so far seen in European Union policy documents.
Behind the G8 proposal lies a concern among ACTA's proponents - the US and its industries - that ACTA may be stalled in the EU and that without EU support it will be of less use.
Thus, it can be inferred that this new G8 proposal has its origins within the United States government, and that the G8 is a funnel to impose American policies, notably that SOPA and PIPA measures - onto the rest of the world (as noted also by EDRi). And they are using a very wide open back door.
It is a signal that that the fall of ACTA (if it happens) will not be the end of the entertainment industries' attack on the Internet. No, instead it will bring on the next stage of their campaign for even more stringent measures.
---
EDRi: Is the G8 already working on a new ACTA?
Read the G8 proposal : Non-Paper On Intellectual Property Rights Protection
You may re-publish my article under a Creative Commons licence, but you should cite my name and provide a link back to iptegrity.com. Media and Academics - please cite as Monica Horten, America ups the ante on ACTA - via the G8, www.iptegrity.com 12 April 2012 . Commercial users - please contact me.
- Article Views: 17720
IPtegrity politics
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Not a blank cheque: European Parliament consents to EU-UK Agreement
- UK border safety alert - mind the capability gap
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
- Copyright-style website blocking orders slipped into Online Safety Bill
- 2 billion cost to British businesses for Online Safety Bill