Leaked Commission letter blasts Hungarian Media Law
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 25 January 2011
A letter written by European Commissioner for Information Society, Neelie Kroes, has seriously criticised the Hungarian Media Law on the basis that it could be incompatible with EU law. The Commission indicates that the law is disproportionate and that it may create a restriction on free speech.
Neelie Kroes letter is addressed to the Deputy Prime Minister of Hungary, Tibor Navracsics. It is dated 21 January 2011, and leaked via a Hungarian website yesterday.
The letter is critical of the Hungarian Media Law on three counts: the obligation for
balanced coverage being made applicable to all audio-visual media providers; the country of origin principle and - most important from the Internet perspective - the registration requirements.
"The analysis of the Commission services also indicates that Article 41A requiring the registration of all media (in particular press and online media) may constitute disproportionate restrictions to the freedom of establishment and the free provision of services. "
It goes on to say that registration of all media, including online media, may constitute a disproportionate restriction on the freedom of establishment and the free provision of services. Commenting specifically on the requirement to register Internet sites and non-private blogs, the Commission said that this "can be considered an unjustified obstacle" to people who want to set up a media service in Hungary, or to provide a service to Hungary from another Member State.
The Commission goes on to say that such an obstacle is "not compatible with the principle of proportionality". Moreover, it is an "unjustified restriction ...on the right to freedom of expression."
Mrs Kroes has given the Hungarian government 2 weeks - which I think takes us to 4 February - to respond to the Commission and to answer how it will address these criticisms. She has also indicated that her services are continuing to analyse the law.
Read Neelie Kroes letter to the Hungarian authorities regarding the Hungarian Media Law
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2011) Leaked Commission letter damns Hungarian Media Law 25 January 2011
- Article Views: 10750
IPtegrity politics
- Shadow bans: EU law says users may not be left in the dark
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Not a blank cheque: European Parliament consents to EU-UK Agreement
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Shadow bans: EU law says users may not be left in the dark
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
- Copyright-style website blocking orders slipped into Online Safety Bill