Portugese prosecutor says file-sharing is not illegal
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 01 October 2012
In Portugal, an attempt by rights-holders to catalyse government action against peer-to-peer file-sharers and Internet downloading, appears to have back-fired. They tried to get the authorities to take action against file-sharers, but instead, they've got an official ruling that file-sharing - at least for personal use - is not illegal.
In a nutshell, the Public Prosector (Minist?rio P?blico) has rejected a complaint over peer-to-peer file-sharing by ACAPOR - the Trade Association for Audiovisual Works and Cultural and Entertainment in Portugal which represents the film industry.
It seems that the ACAPOR took an unusual step to open their complaint. They literally dumped a printed list of 1970-2000 IP addresses on at the reception desk of the Departamento de Investiga??o e Ac??o Penal de Lisboa - the Department of Investigation and Penal Action - where the public prosecutor's office is situated. Torrentfreak has a photograph on of the parcels being deposited.
The IP addresses had been harvested on peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing networks, where users were sharing copyrighted files. The ACAPOR alleged the users linked to those IP addresses were infringing copyright.
The Public Prosecutor has responded by saying that it would be far too much of an expense for the public purse to pay for an investigation into all 2000 alleged copyright infringements individually. Portugal is after all, part of the Eurozone and struggling with a large national debt.
In a significant ruling released last week, the Public Prosecutor said that under Portugese law, file-sharing for personal use is not illegal. The Prosecutor set his statement in the context of the right to freedom of expression.
The ruling explains that the individual who holds the contract for the service, and who would therefore be associated with the IP address, might be a different person from the user of the peer-to-peer software. This is a point that is argued in each case where rights-holders go after peer-to-peer users and it is a relevent point.
This ruling has deeply upset the Portugese rights-holders. The ACAPOR said in a statement that it went against all logic. The Portugese Society of Authors is 'perplexed' by the ruling.
However, in a rather unusual twist, the Prosecutor has said that the rights-holders should specifically declare that they are not authorising copying for personal use.
ACAPOR seems to be interpret this as meaning that that the private copying exception now applies to P2P file-sharing.
This is an original article from Iptegrity.com. If you refer to it or to its content, you should cite my name as the author, and provide a link back to iptegrity.com. Media and Academics - please cite as Monica Horten, Portugese prosecutor says file-sharing is not illegal, in www.iptegrity.com, 1 October 2012 . Commercial users - please contact me.
- Article Views: 14328
IPtegrity politics
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Not a blank cheque: European Parliament consents to EU-UK Agreement
- UK border safety alert - mind the capability gap
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
- Copyright-style website blocking orders slipped into Online Safety Bill
- 2 billion cost to British businesses for Online Safety Bill