Strike One: Hadopi fires the first shots
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 24 September 2010
Up to 1000 French Internet subscribers are to get warnings next week. They will be accused of downloading a file which is susceptible of containing copyrighted material, through an unprotected Internet access. The ISPs have mysteriously caved in, under a possible secret deal with the French government.
The first warning emails under France's 3-strikes law are due to go out in the next few days. It follows a request this week by the Hadopi (the body which oversees the law) for the contact details of Internet subscribers based on IP addresses supplied by the rights-holders.
According to reports in the French media, the exact number of addresses requested is not clear - it is
either 800 (Numerama ) or 1000 (PC Inpact ). The Internet subscribers will be informed that their non-secured Internet access had been used to download a file susceptible of containing infringing material (the legal nicety is that they will not be directly accused of a suspected infringement, as explained by PC Inpact .) Under the so-called 3-strikes law, a second accusation will result in a further warning, and if there is a third accusation they can be either fined or cut off the Internet.
What's not clear is the agreement between Hadopi and the ISPs. Some reports suggest that there is no agreement. An agreement needs to be in place to sort out the method of working and the costs. For example, how the ISPs will handle the transmission of thousands of user contacts to the Hadopi, and who will pay for it. For the numbers anticipated, there will need to be an automated system and the ISPs want the government to pay them to do it.
It is understood that the rights-holders have already deluged the Hadopi with thousands of IP addresses, but since there is no system in place, the transmission is being handled manually at the moment. Hence the relatively low number of users who will get the first warnings.
Numerama says that there should be a ‘voluntary' agreement with the ISPs , and if such agreement cannot be reached, then the Hadopi is entitled to impose one on them. However, there is no sign of any agreement, voluntary or imposed, and apparently both ISPs and the Hadopi are maintaining a total silence on the subject.
At issue is the cost. No reimbursement fees have been agreed yet between Hadopi and the ISPs, who want 8.5 Euro per contact.
It is therefore puzzling why the ISPs are collaborating with the Hadopi - apparently, all have been convinced to co-operate, even Free.fr which had previously said that it would not co-operate. They are being threatened with a fine of 1500 Euro persubscriber contact for non-compliance, which might be a factor.
The French media is hypothesising that the government has done a deal with the ISPs. The likelihood that a deal has been brokered was revealed by the Culture Minister, Frédéric Mitterand , in an interview last week. The content of the deal is unknown. It is however, thought to relate to traffic management and "net neutrality".
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2010) Strike One: Hadopi fires the first shots http://www.iptegrity.com 24 September 2010
- Article Views: 9679
IPtegrity politics
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?