Will Lex Google guillotine the publishers?
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 31 October 2012
Outright war declared between Google and the French media.
France could have a law in place by next year that could kill off large chunks of Twitter and cause whole swathes of cyberspace to fall silent. The law, dubbed Lex Google, is demanded by French, German and Italian media in name of protecting their businesses. It puts at risk the lifeblood of Internet communication, namely hyper-linking. The outcome could be an all-out commercial war between the print media and the Internet giant Google.
The media companies want the government to force Google to pay for linking to their web-pages. This is not about copyright. It is a battle over advertising revenues, and arguably a mis-guided attempt by media-owners to try to recoup some ad money that has run away with the Internet.
The idea for the Lex Google law has been put forward by a lobby group called IPG, representing media companies and newspapers.
French President Francois Hollande is reported to have told them that he would support the adoption of such a law early in 2013. The law unsurprisingly has the support of the of Culture Ministry (which was responsible for the Hadopi law), although the other Ministry involved (Digital Economy), is said to be less enthousiastic.
But the Lex Google law could end up with an own goal for the media companies. Google has threatened that if the government pursues this law, it will cut the French media out of its indexes entirely. That would put all French newspapers into cyber-darkness. It would be likely to severely slash their page views, and one would think, have a negative effect on advertising.
According to Le Figaro, the threat was reported by the French news agency Agence France Press, which got hold of a leaked letter from Google to various government minstries.
On Monday this week, the two sides met across the table. As reported by the Owni blog, Google chief Eric Schmidt stepped into the sumptuous rooms at the Elysee for a face-to-face with President Hollande, Fleur Pell?rin, Minister for the Digital Economy, and Culture Minister, Aur?lie Filippettii.
On Friday, Eric Schmidt will have a second meeting with the Digital Economy Minister, Fleur Pellerin.
The media groups claim that Google makes a large percentage of its profits out of linking to their content, and this claim forms the basis of their demand for the new law.
It's not surprising that there has been an outcry from Internet users, who say the Lex Google law is total folly.
According to Guillaume Champeau of Numerama, the law would forbid just about any kind of linking, even from websites other than Google. Links from Wikipedia and other websites that rely on citations of sources would be forbidden. It would even be against the law for companies to pull together their own press cuttings on a page using links to the orignal articles.
Champeau notes the irony that the Lex Google will put free speech in France severely at risk, yet it is demanded by the media who purport to defend free speech.
Certainly, Lex Google will have the effect of guillotining content. The question is, whose content - big media or all the rest of us?
This is an original article from Iptegrity.com. If you refer to it or to its content, you should cite my name as the author, and provide a link back to iptegrity.com. Media and Academics - please cite as Monica Horten, Will Lex Google guillotine the publishers? in www.iptegrity.com, 31 October 2012 . Commercial users - please contact me.
- Article Views: 18824
IPtegrity politics
- Shadow bans: EU law says users may not be left in the dark
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Not a blank cheque: European Parliament consents to EU-UK Agreement
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Shadow bans: EU law says users may not be left in the dark
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
- Copyright-style website blocking orders slipped into Online Safety Bill