Looking for help with the Online Safety Act  - Ofcom consultation & guidelines? Please get in touch. 

Telecoms Package 2nd Reading

Telecoms Package 2nd Reading

This section of iptegrity.com is devoted to analysing the Telecoms Package Second Reading in the European Parliament. In it, I have published articles, papers and analysis notes which took a critical look at the proposed texts and what they might have meant for European citizens and users, with a particular focus on the Internet and content issues.

The Telecoms Package was the review of European telecommunications framework legislation, (for full details please see the other section on iptegrity.com labelled Telecoms Package). Over 800 amendments were originally tabled to the two main directives involved - the so-called Better Regulation directive which incorporates the Framework, Access and Authoritisation directives - and the so-called Citizens Rights directive - which incorporates the Universal Services directive and the e-Privacy directive.

With so many amendments, covering such a broad scope of legislation, it is almost impossible for anyone, even specialists, to have a grasp of their meaning in real life. Let alone members of the European Parliament, for whom this is just one of many subjects, and where they are reliant on their assistants, who in turn rely on lobbyists. This is especially true since the real meaning of many amendments depends on how they are inter-linked with others. Following the chain of links, to figure out, is a complex task. However, when one does so, some serious consequences are being revealed.

The over-arching problem is that this is policy being made by changes in the law. The scope of the telecoms framework is being altered via often subtle wording changes in the amendments. The changing scope is de facto establishing policy, and by-passing the correct policy processes which have been established in the European Union.

To give an idea of the scale of the problem, one telecoms lawyer complained to me that he had 250 pages of documents to read through, in order to analyse the Package and do the job properly. What did he have? The Council compromise documents for the two main bundles in the Package - Better Regulation and Citizens rights - plus the Common position for reference. For those of us who have been with the Telecoms Package since the beginning, trawling through this amount of documentation is strangely normal. It also puts into perspective the enormity of the job for the European Parliament, and begs the question whether MEPs can really do it justice in the time allowed.

If you like the articles in this section and you are interested in Eu telecoms policy and the 2009 Telecoms Package, especially with regard to copyright enforcement policy, you may like my books A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms and The Copyright Enforcement Enigma - Internet Politics and the 'Telecoms Package'

You may like my book The Closing of the Net which positions the story of the 2009 Telecoms Package in the wider policy context.



Amendment 138 puts a spoke in ACTA

Monica Horten
Published on 22 May 2009
  • Print

But will it help the EU to resist a US push for multi-lateral 3-strikes?

 

The political significance of the Telecoms Package Amendment 138 has been  raised a notch or two with the revelation that its fate will determine what the EU will agree to in the ACTA - Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement.

The ACTA is a multi-lateral agreement on intellectual property  enforcement,  being pushed by the US Trade Representative,  which is an international lobby for US corporate interests - in respect of copyright, the powerful Hollywood studios and US broadcasters. ACTA is being negotiated in secret, however, the content is slowly emerging.   It aims at stringent measures to enforce copyright on a global basis, and among other things, deals with Internet downloading. Requests for public access to ACTA documents have been refused, but one did emerge on Wikileaks.

 Canadian lawyer Michael Geist  reports  on his blog that there is a rift between the EU and the US in the ACTA

Read more: Amendment 138 puts a spoke in ACTA

Malcolm Harbour: Amendment 138 "only a principle"

Monica Horten
Published on 21 May 2009
  • Print

A leaked document shows that the rapporteur for users rights does not get the Internet rights issue.

 

A document authored  by the MEP Malcolm Harbour, rapporteur for the Universal Services and Users rights directive, attempts to dismiss the users rights Amendment 138 saying that it is "badly placed and lost" and "concerns only a principle regarding restrictions".  The document appears to be a note written for internal use. His comments are interesting in light of claims by proponents of Amendment 138 that they have protected users rights and that Internet is now a fundamental right.

 He compares Amendment 138   to the so-called "compromise"agreement which concerns "measures taken regarding end-users rights of access to or use of services and applications".

 Of particular interest, is that he suggests that the phrasing on "measures" creates  a right for end-users. The

Read more: Malcolm Harbour: Amendment 138 "only a principle"

Malcolm Harbour attacks Liberals on Amendment 138

Monica Horten
Published on 13 May 2009
  • Print

Malcolm Harbour, rapporteur for users rights in the Telecoms Package, has  attacked colleagues who supported an amendment which protects the right to  freedom of expression in respect of the Internet.

 

In an email circulated to all MEPs, Malcolm Harbour has attacked the  Liberal group in the European Parliament. He accuses them of  stalling the entire Telecoms Package  and says that the Amendment 138, which seeks to protect users rights in respect of freedom of expression and the Internet is not important  and ‘unconnected with any of the main changes in the Telecoms Package'. His complaint  rings hollow, given that an important users rights amendment in his directive was replaced by one that permits restriction of users rights, and the replacement was  never voted on by either his committee (IMCO) or the full Parliament. 

 

 His email reveals that there was a last-minute meeting of the Liberal party group, which took the decision to

Read more: Malcolm Harbour attacks Liberals on Amendment 138

More Articles...

  1. European Parliament rejects Telecoms Package
  2. Users coalition angered by Harbour's 'fantasy' claims
  3. European Parliament dirty trick on Internet vote
  4. Telecoms Package - a licence to chill
  5. Fight for the Net in EU taken up by the left
  6. Malcolm Harbour "frustrated" by users rights
  7. Telecoms Package Internet sell-out now agreed
  8. Internet rights sold down the line by European Parliament
  9. Harbour's Amendment 166 re-write reverses users rights

Find me on LinkedIn

My Amazon Author's page

About Iptegrity

Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten. I am an  independent policy advisor, with expertise in online safety, technology and human rights. I am a published author, and post-doctoral scholar. I hold a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. I cover the UK and EU. I'm a former tech journalist, and an experienced panelist and Chair. My media credits include the BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.

Speaking engagements

My books

Iptegrity.com is made available free of charge for non-commercial use. Please link back and attribute Dr Monica Horten.  Contact me to use any of my content for commercial purposes.