EU privacy rules - terminate 'safe harbor' says German MEP
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 29 October 2013
In Germany, public anger over the interception of Chancellor Merkel's mobile phone by NSA intelligence services - known as Handygate - is indicative of the high level of feeling against the United States on the issue of data privacy. And now it has emerged that German MEPs are hatching a retaliatory plan that would impose a legal barrier to US firms who want to export European citizens' data to the US for processing.
The proposal has come not from the left of the European Parliament, as one might expect, but surprisingly, from the right. Manfred Weber, a German MEP from the Conservative EPP group, has told the German news managzine Der Spiegel that the EU should terminate a long-standing agreement that underpins the transfer of European citizens' personal data to the United States.
This is the so-called 'safe harbor' agreement, which was put in place in an attempt to provide a level of legal protection for European citizens's data, when it is held and processed in the US by American companies. Under 'safe harbor', they should implement the same rules that they are obliged to put in place in EU countries. However, the situation has changed considerably in the decade or more since 'safe harbor' was drafted. In that time, Google, FaceBook, Twitter, eBay, Amazon and Skype, some of which were not even conceived when the 'safe harbor' drafters wrote their text, have all emerged as major global players - and they hold a lot of data on European citizens that they regularly transfer to the US for processing. Many other firms have also registered under the agreement.
Manfred Weber believes it is time for a new form of regulation of data transfers between the EU and the US. The USA and US-based businesses should "play the game according to European rules" he told Der Spiegel.
Mr Weber tweeted that he is already drafting the text for a Motion for a Resolution, calling for an end to 'safe harbor' to put before the European Parliament. He is calling on other Party Groups to join him in putting forward the Resolution, and has immediately secured the support of Jan-Philipp Albrecht, the rapporteur for the Data Protection Directive. Mr Albrecht is also a German MEP, his support for such a motion would not normally be surprising, except that he is from the Green group - usually an opponent, rather than an ally, of the EPP.
If 'safe harbor' were to be terminated, it would impose a legal barrier to the continued operation of US companies who transfer data across the Atlantic, although there is probably little to enforce it under current legislation. That's where the new Data Protection Regulation would step in, when and if adopted, with its super-strong sanctions.
What's interesting is that Manfred Weber is deputy leader of the conservative EPP group,which gives him a bit of clout. However, the EPP is not usually known for taking a radical stance on anything, especially where industry is concerned.
It's more than likely that Mr Weber's move is being driven by domestic politics at home in Germany, where the alleged interception of the mobile phone of Chancellor Angela Merkel by US intelligence agents in the NSA, has caused outrage in the media and among the population. The affair has become known as 'Handygate', after the German word for a mobile phone, (pronounced 'hendy').
In that context, some members of Mr Weber's party, the Christian Social Union of Bavaria, have called for the EU-US trade talks to be put on ice, and others have criticised the United States for a grave breach of trust.
This is an original article from Iptegrity.com and reflects research that I have carried out. If you refer to it or to its content, please cite my name as the author, and provide a link back to iptegrity.com. Media and Academics - please cite as Monica Horten, 2013, EU Privacy rules - terminate 'safe harbor' says German MEP in Iptegrity.com, 28 October 2013. Commercial users - please contact me.
- Article Views: 18125
IPtegrity politics
- Why would the UK take on Apple?
- What's influencing tech policy in 2025?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Online Safety
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?