Viviane Reding's wake-up call
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 13 July 2009
Viviane Reding says she will tackle the collecting societies on pan-European licencing and she will back projects for cloud computing. That should be good news. But Our Lady of the U-turns has done it again. Because in the same speech she calls for the Telecoms Package to come into force, ignoring that it is about restricting innovative Internet services, and tries to belittle the importance of Amendment 138 which seeks to safeguard users' rights.
In a speech to the Lisbon council in Brussels last week, European Commissioner for Information Society, Viviane Reding, has vowed to tackle the biggest obstacle to so-called legal online content services - the collecting societies and their resistance to a pan-European licence for Internet music and film rights.
"In my view,growing internet piracy is a vote of
A pan-European licencing scheme would make it possible to buy the rights to use music and film content on the Internet across all EU countries. To date, it has not been possible due to the collecting societies who represent the rights-holders refusing to change the way they offer their licences.
However, the political issue is whether or not she has the power to address it because copyright properly belongs in the Internal Market directorate, and not in hers. She says she is working with Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes, who famously invited Mick Jagger to sit on her elite advisory committee of rights- and patent-holders.
Mrs Reding also said that cloud computing is a priority on her agenda, apparently to open up the Digital Economy to small businesses.
But as usual, she contradicts herself - in continuing to push for the Telecoms Package to be adopted as it it stands, she stands to reverse any benefits she may create. The provisions in the Package to restrict the Internet will be harmful to small businesses, risking a long slow strangulation of their business that will outlive the credit crunch.
Mrs Reding is torn once again between supporting her friends in the film and music industries, and doing her job as Commissioner for the Information Society, which is based on an open Internet. What is at stake is that she wants to stand for a third term as Commissioner.
It is evident that she is only interested in supporting the industry and not citizens. Her attempt to diminish the importance of Amendment 138 by citing statistics does not fool anyone ( see page 6 of her speech). Who in the Commission had time to count the Telecoms Package amendments?
It seems to me to be a nonsense that the Commission continues to maintain this position that there is no other problem with the Telecoms Package. If Mrs Reding really wants to help Europe's Digital Economy, and develop the next-generation network infrastructure, her first step should be to remove the Internet restriction provisions in the Telecoms Package.
Moreover, her positioning of the Internet issue would appear a little naive . She seems to think that it's only about 16-year olds, who need to be re-trained into passive consumers:
"Have we really looked at the issue through the eyes of a 16 year old? Or only from the
perspective of law professors who grew up in the Gutenberg Age?" she said... and she went on to say
"Digital Europe can only be built with content creators on board; and with the generation of digital natives as interested users and innovative consumers"
The implication is that the content creators are industry. The youth of today, who are used to creating their own content, are to be turned into mere ‘consumers'. What she fails to understand is that people of all ages (over 18) download. And the Internet is not just about media, music and film. People do their banking and shopping, and job searches, and work, on the Internet. To position the issue around 16 year olds downloading pop music is to shoot the arrow way off the target.
What is also rather concerning, is that she launched a strategy for Digital Europe, based on partially-completed study, by the UK-based telecoms consultants Analysys-Mason , and citing the Digital Britain report as an example to follow. The Digital Britain report, proposes, among other things, to give the regulator, Ofcom, the duty to reduce file-sharing and implement technical measures against file-sharers including protocol blocking.
And she still has an open consultation on Next Generation Networks and Universal Services. It is arguably of limited benefit if the Commission does not intend to take the responses into account.
Read the speech: Viviane Reding: Digital Europe – Europe's Fast Track to Economic Recovery
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2009), http://www.iptegrity.com 13 July 2009.
- Article Views: 12060
IPtegrity politics
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Online Safety
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?