Catherine Trautmann rewrites net neutrality policy
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 09 November 2009
Catherine Trautmann, rapporteur for the Telecoms Package framework directive, has asked the European Commission to take a full review of net neutrality, and stated that it should be enshrined as a principle under EU law.
As the spotlight focussed on the replacement of Amendment 138, another element of the Telecoms Package agreement last week fell into the shadows. Regular iptegrity readers will know that a Declaration on Net Neutrality from the European Commission was also on the cards, and that I was somewhat critical of the way it had been written.
A re-worked version of the Declaration on Net Neutrality was also
agreed last Wednesday and has finally emerged into the light. (See below). It appears to have been drafted by the rapporteur, Catherine Trautmann. It's interesting that Mrs Trautmann has tightened up the Commission's original wording. Where the Commission was playing fast and loose with users' rights, and would have just monitored the restrictions permitted in the Harbour report, Mrs Trautmann is saying that is not good enough.
Mrs Trautmann refers to a "decision" of the co-legislators to "enshrine net neutrality as a policy objective". This is interesting. If there is a decision made by the Council and the European Parliament (the co-legislators) to enshrine net neutrality in EU policy, then this could represent a political signal for Europe.
She crosses out the Commission's concept of 'net freedoms' which is a piece of "commission-ese" and legally meaningless.
Mrs Trautmann further asks the Commission to ensure that competition law is used in situations where it does apply, and requests the Commission to conduct a legislative review of issues related to net neutrality, covering fixed and wireless communications. She has asked for the review to be completed by 2011.
Unlike the Commission's original text, this version of the Declaration makes a stronger policy commitment and points towards legislation. It will of course still take a few years before the legislation is in place, years when network operators could wreak havoc with the Internet as we know it, if they chose to do so. Some commentators suggest that a strong political signal like this, will keep them at bay. I am sceptical whether industrial giants like Deutsche Telekom and Telefonica will be frightened of future legislation.
The Jury remains out on the Telecoms Package outcome. I will report further when I have gathered more views and opinions.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2009) Catherine Trautmann re-writes net neutrality policy http://www.iptegrity.com 9 November 2009.
- Article Views: 13440
IPtegrity politics
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Not a blank cheque: European Parliament consents to EU-UK Agreement
- UK border safety alert - mind the capability gap
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Online Safety
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
- Copyright-style website blocking orders slipped into Online Safety Bill
- 2 billion cost to British businesses for Online Safety Bill