Is the Telecoms Package innovation-hostile?
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 10 September 2009
Innovation does not come from boardrooms, and the view of the panel was that discriminatory practices permitted under the Telecoms Package put innovation at risk.
Report from Green Group/Pirate Party seminar: Telecoms Package, preparing for a third reading, European Parliament 7 September 2009
Dr Malte Behrmann, of the European Games Developers Federation, said that games developers have found new business models, which are now under threat of blocking by telecoms operators. "The real problem is the risk of
abuse. He criticised the mis-use of filtering technology in order to prioritise content and asked "what happens when they mis-use competition? He went on to say "there is no such thing as being a little bit pregnant" implying that 'a little bit free' is also not an option. The core of the Internet has to stay free, he said. "Co-operation and discussions are interesting, but that is not really the point. These amendments are innovation-hostile".
In Dr Behrmann's view, we need to understand who has a real interest in the Telecoms Package and restrictions on Internet content. It is "the people who want to leverage their oligopolies from off-line to on-line" he said.
Caroline DeCock, speaking for the VON coalition which represents voice-over-IP services, was clear that blocking or degradation of Internet services could be devastating for innovation. She called for a clarification of the regulation of network management in the Telecoms Package, saying the discriminatory practices should not be permitted and the rules should be clear and maintain open access, without gatekeepers. The use of devices should not be restricted. She highlighted that peer-to-peer services are used for purposes other than the downloading of copyrighted content, and cited the example of the European nuclear research community.
Jeremie Zimmermann, of La Quadrature du Net, stressed that French all three mobile operators block Skype and peer-to-peer. This demolishes the argument of Telecoms Package proponents that market competition will resolve the issue. It clearly will not resove anything if all operators co-operate on blockages.
Magnus Eriksson, speaking for the Julia group, a new group of Swedish academics and citizens interested in Internet issues, warned against the use of blacklists and whitelists to create a divided Internet, and spoke of the need to preserve the open Internet as a facilitator for innovation. "Innovation does not come from board rooms" he quipped.
There is a radical solution for the Telecoms Package, as pointed out by Caroline De Cock: remove all of the provisions relating to content.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2009)Is the Telecoms Package innovation-hostile?, http://www.iptegrity.com 10 September 2009.
- Article Views: 9907
IPtegrity politics
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Online Safety
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?