Net neutrality: a political football as telecoms rules begin legislative journey
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 11 November 2013
As the European Parliament begins work on the new Telecoms Regulation, there are early warning signals that the issue of net neutrality will be heavily fought over. It has emerged that the two big committees with responsibility for telecoms both wanted to take it on. There was a tussle between the two, and in the end, it was subject to higher level decision that gave net neutrality to the Industry committee. Moreover, it looks as though net neutrality will be one key element that
the Parliament wants to address, if it can do so, before it breaks up for the European elections.
The official rapporteur on the Regulation (Proposal on a European single market for electronic communications and to achieve a Connected Continent ) is the Spanish EPP Pilar del Castillo. But, it emerged in the ITRE and IMCOmeetings last week that some of the work could be divided between the two committees.
Malcolm Harbour, chair of the IMCO committee and responsible for the IMCO Opinion, has also sought to get a share of the net neutrality action. Mr Harbour said in last Monday's meeting that his committee will take the lead on the 'users rights' elements that were his responsibility in the 2009 Telecoms Package. He also felt that net neutrality belonged under that umbrella.
But the administration in the European Parliament has allocated net neutrality to the ITRE committee, under the rapporteur Pilar del Castillo.
In the ITRE committee meeting last week, Mrs Del Castillo said 'Internet is something that cannot wait. We need a decision quickly. Parliament will do its part of the bargain' - although it is not clear what 'bargain' she is referring to.
It would seem that Mrs Del Castillo wants to establish a position for the Parliament by the Spring.
Indeed, the deadlines for the Telecoms Regulation amendments are very tight.
Speaking in the IMCO committee meeting, Mr Harbour said that the two of them would be working jointly on the net neutrality elements. He made a number of comments on the topic of net neutrality.
Whilst stating that net neutrality was not a well defined concept, Mr Harbour positioned it in light of the 2009 directive that he piloted through the Parliament. In several references to it, he said he did not want to go back on that position.
In the context of net neutrality, and given that the 2009 directive contains the infamous 'conditions limiting' language, I am not entirely sure what he means. However, it was clear that he intends to push the boat out to get through the huge amount of work on this massive piece of legislation and it is to be hoped that this is a positive signal.
Mrs del Castillo, for her part, organised a shot-gun consultation to gather in the views of NGOs. The deadline for submissions was last week. For those new to the European political process, this was a somewhat unusual move.
It is already clear that the European Parliament does not like the new Telecoms Regulation (New telecoms rules: EU Commission had no time to consult ) My feeling is that the European Parliament is very likely drop the other controversial provisionsin the Telecoms Regulation, notably those that mitigate in favour of the market consolidation that the Commission is seeking ( See EU Parliament threat to knife new telecoms rules) . It will keep only those that can be easily addressed, the one exception being net neutrality. Although, as Mr Harbour says, net neutrality is not explicitly defined in the draft Telecoms Regulation, the provisions in Article 23 do address the issue of net neutrality.
I'd put money on there being a big fight over net neutrality as the Telecoms Regulation makes its way through the Parliament. It will be the hot political football fought over between external interests, with the rapporteur, Pilar del Castillo, having the stressful role of mediation. It certainly promises to be interesting.
---
Malcolm Harbour made many references to the 2009 Telecoms Package. Anyone who did not follow it in 2009, may find themselves struggling with this one. Happily, there is a book! The Copyright Enforcement Enigma will enlighten you on the events of the 2009 Telecoms Package and the issues that the Committees are now discussing again!
This is an original article from Iptegrity.com and reflects research that I have carried out. If you refer to it or to its content, please cite my name as the author, and provide a link back to iptegrity.com. Media and Academics - please cite as Monica Horten, 2013, Net neutrality: a political football as telecoms rules begin legislative journey, in Iptegrity.com 11 November 2013. Commercial users - please contact me.
- Article Views: 18233
IPtegrity politics
- What's influencing tech policy in 2025?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Online Safety
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?