Telecoms Package Hidden Amendments
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 22 June 2008
The "Telecoms Package" comprises reviews to 5 sets of directives, but for the copyright issue there are two which are important: Amendments to the Electronic communications: common regulatory framework for networks and services, access, interconnection and authorisation ( Directives 2002/19/EC to 2002/21/EC]) and the Electronic communications: universal
service, users' rights relating to networks and services, processing of personal data, protection of privacy, consumer protection cooperation (Directives 2002/22/EC, 2002/58/EC and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004.The package is currently under review in the European Parliament. Amendments proposed will alter the framework of telecoms legislation. These amendments taken together do appear to make specific changes which are needed to pave the way for '3 strikes' proposals to be brought in. Under EU law as it stands, '3 strikes' would not be legal, hence why these changes are being lobbied for.
The amendments will:
- weaken privacy rules, enabling data retention in some form for the purposes of pursuing copyright infringers and altering the principle of data protection which currently prevents ISPs from divulging user identity and other personal information
- enable member states to set up a process for pursuing and sanctioning copyright infringement outside the domain of the courts (ie a privatised law enforcement process for copyright, where ISPs will act on the basis of information supplied by copyright owners)
- oblige ISPs to alter the terms and conditions in their contracts with end users, enabling them to sanction and cut off users who infringe copyright
- do away with the right of users to freely distribute content (including their own)
-legally block access to websites and web content
Committee votes are scheduled for July, and a plenary vote in September.
- Article Views: 9115
IPtegrity politics
- Why would the UK take on Apple?
- What's influencing tech policy in 2025?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Online Safety
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?