Europe's telcos oppose 'outside - in' ACTA threat
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 02 July 2010
The Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) that was discussed this week in a secret meeting in Switzerland, threatens fundamental principles of European telecoms law, in particular the ‘mere conduit' provision, according to Europe's leading telecommunications companies. It's an ‘outside-in' change to EU law by international treaty, they say.
An alliance of European telecoms groups has taken an unusually strong stand against ACTA. The alliance is led by the economically powerful ETNO, whose members include Deutsche Telekom, France Telecom and BT, and ETNO is joined by European associations of ISPs, mobile operators, e-commerce and Internet companies, and cable companies.
In a joint statement, they say that ACTA could jeopardise key provisions in the acquis communitaire including the important mere conduit principle which underpins the Internet in Europe. They advise that ACTA contains a series of provisions which contradict the EU acquis, and which would also hinder
the development of new online services and contradict the objectives for the European Digital Agenda.
The European telecoms and technology companies are concerned that EU law will be changed by an ‘outside-in' manoeuvre of non-elected administrators, without proper democratic scrutiny. These legal changes will have profound and detrimental effects on their businesses.
The joint statement calls for the European Parliament to have more than just transparency. They want to see the Parliament have full democratic oversight of new legislation by until the ACTA negotiations are complete.
The telecoms companies say that the draft liability provisions in the ACTA Internet chapter are in contradiction with the E-Commerce Directive. ACTA places policy goals for copyright and IPR ahead of the ‘mere conduit' principle. In this way, ‘mere conduit' could be eroded, and ACTA stands to undermine the functioning of the Information Society (which is EU jargon for the Internet).
The telcos also assert that criminal sanctions provisions in ACTA go beyond the existing EU legal framework, and that privacy of EU citizens is put at risk
Read the full statement on ACTA from ETNO, Euro-ISPA, GSM Association, EDIMA, and Cable Europe.
It's interesting to compare the telco comments with the answers received by a civil society group which met with the ACTA negotiators this week. The negotiators continue to deny that there will be any effect on either the EU aquis or fundamental rights.
ACTA talks concluded Thursda y -next meeting in US - no date or location
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2010) Europe's telcos oppose 'outside - in' ACTA threat http://www.iptegrity.com 2 July 2010
- Article Views: 7885
IPtegrity politics
- How could they ban X?
- Grok AI images: can compliance be enforced?
- AI and copyright – an author’s viewpoint
- UK climb-down over Apple back-door was foreseeable
- Copyright wars 3.0: the AI challenge
- Why would the UK take on Apple?
- What's influencing tech policy in 2025?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy analyst: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- How could they ban X?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
