Wow what a scorcher! ACTA slaughtered 478 to 39
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 04 July 2012
In just five dramatic minutes, the European Parliament has killed off ACTA, the so-called Anti- counterfeiting trade agreement. In a resounding vote in the last half hour, the entire Parliament voted by 478 votes to 39 to decline its consent to ACTA. This means that the ACTA may not be ratified in Europe, and effectively means it is dead in the water. The rapporteur, David Martin, spoke of
giving ACTA the last rites, and allowing its supporters, the rights-holders and the US government, to mourn.
It certainly was an exciting five minutes, for that was all it took. In the President's chair was Alejo Vidal Quadras, who had chaired the Telecoms Package Conciliation committee in the Third Reading.(see Telecoms Package sealed, but not with a kiss ). He would ave been well aware of the implications of this vote.
An intervention by the right of the Parliament, namely Christofer Fjellner of the EPP group to get the vote postponed until after the ruling by the European Court of Justice, was quashed by a huge majoirity - 644 in favour. It's interesting that Fjellner, formerly a pro-active MEP in favour of Internet users rights, was asking for this. Technically, Mr Fjellner's motion asked to put the whole matter of ACTA back to the INTA committee until after the ECJ has ruled.
Klaus-Heine Lehne, also EPP and German, spoke in favour of Mr Fjellner's motion. The rapporteur, David Martin, spoke against Mr Fjellner's motion.
And so the European Parliament proceeded to vote directly on Davd Martin's recommendation, which was that the Parliament should decline its consent to ACTA. The hemicycle was full with 682 MEPs present. 165 abstained - they would have been ECR and EPP. The majority was 478 with only 39 against.
After the vote, a small group of MEPs held up posters saying "hello democracy, good-bye ACTA'.
The European Commission was given the opportunity to respond. The response was made by a deputy. Trade Commissioner Karel de Gucht did not show up. Perhaps it was just as well. The hoots - unusually discourteous for the European Parliament - would have been uncomfortable listening.
Congrats are in order for the guys at La Quadrature du Net and Edri who co-ordinated the ACTA campaign in Europe.
This is an original article from Iptegrity.com. You may re-publish it under a Creative Commons licence, but you should cite my name and provide a link back to iptegrity.com. Media and Academics - please cite as Monica Horten,Wow what a scorcher! ACTA slaughtered 478 to 39 , in www.iptegrity.com, 3rd July 2012 . Commercial users - please contact me.
- Article Views: 28737
IPtegrity politics
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Not a blank cheque: European Parliament consents to EU-UK Agreement
- UK border safety alert - mind the capability gap
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
- Copyright-style website blocking orders slipped into Online Safety Bill
- 2 billion cost to British businesses for Online Safety Bill