Beware "voluntary" cooperation on IP
-
Author: Monica Horten
-
Published: 16 December 2009
The European Union held a seminar today on the enforcement of intellectual property rights. Hot on the discussion list was what to do about those organisations involved in online selling of counterfeit goods and services (for which read that they are targetting eBay and peer-to-peer file-sharing).
The meeting was held behind closed doors but they obviously could not resist revealing just a little of what they were doing.
Some 200 people were invited to the meeting which was hosted in Stockholm by the Swedish Presidency. The press release from the European Commission did its best to position counterfeiting and piracy as a
moral, health and economic hazard, using language worthy of the famous quote by Jack Valenti, then chairman of the Motion Picture Association (MPA), who likened the video-cassette to the Boston Strangler. According to the European Comission press statement , online counterfeiting and piracy is " an affliction that is bringing criminality ever closer to our doors. It destabilises our societies and threatens public safety and jobs. More than this it places our hard earned money into the hands of criminals who have no conscience about using it to fund other forms of crime, including drugs and pornography".
It hardly comes as a surprise to those who have followed the development of the Telecoms Package, that the Commission says " there is an acute need to support enforcement efforts through practical non legislative means." The recommended solution is "voluntary arrangements to tackle concrete problems such as the sale of counterfeit goods and services over the internet."
It does seem that the outgoing Commissioner, Charlie McReevy, is somewhat over-egging of the problem and one must question how helpful this really is, outside the closed and narrow interest group in that room in Stockholm. However, the new Commissioner taking over this dossier is a Frenchman so be prepared for the heavy tactics to continue.
The Swedish Presidency official statement says the seminar will be discussing 'legislation as well as other measures'.
A report on the German IT website Heise Online says they will be discussing IPRED2, the IPR enforcement directive proposing criminal measures, which was stalled in the EU. And, according to Heise, ACTA - the Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement - is also on the agenda. Leaked documents related to ACTA suggest that ISP liability for copyright is being proposed, as well as a whole basket of other measures against online users.
It's not a coincidence that MPA is calling for "practical secondary liability regimes" within ACTA, to "motivate" ISPs into such co-operation ( See Michael Geist's blog ).
.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2009) EU: Beware "voluntary" cooperation on IP , http://www.iptegrity.com 15 December 2009.
-
Article Views: 10708
IPtegrity politics
- Social media ban for kids: simple message, tough choices
- How could they ban X?
- Grok AI images: can compliance be enforced?
- AI and copyright – an author’s viewpoint
- UK climb-down over Apple back-door was foreseeable
- Copyright wars 3.0: the AI challenge
- Why would the UK take on Apple?
- What's influencing tech policy in 2025?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy analyst: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Social media ban for kids: simple message, tough choices
- How could they ban X?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
