Medina report indefinitely abandoned
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 22 February 2009
The Medina report has been indefinitely postponed, and may be shelved forever, according to reports emerging from the European Parliament.
The controversial Medina report, which attempted to get the European Parliament to vote in favour of graduated response, has been postponed. It is understood that it has been removed from the European Parliament's agenda, at least until after the European elections and possibly forever. The sources for this information are apparently the administrative staff in the
JURI committee secretariat. One report says that the Socialist group in the European Parliament did not want a "war" of competing resolutions, which suggests that other members of the group were proposing to table amendments that would oppose the content of the Medina report. Manuel Medina Ortega is a member of the Socialist group, and so is Guy Bono , who tabled Amendment 138 which opposes graduated response. So also is Arlene McCarthy , the IMCO committee chair, who tabled amendments to the Medina report supporting enforcment of copyright. Certainly, had the Medina report got to the plenary, it would have created a political problem for the Socialists. It would also have created a problem for the Telecoms Package, because the Parliament could not have passed it, and continued its support for Amendment 138.
Early reports in the Spanish press had given the tip off about a week ago, but it wasn't certain how accurate they were. The news then emerged last week in a press release from La Quadrature du Net . Further confirmation has appeared on the website of Scambio Etico, an Italian campaigning organisation. The latter quotes Innocenzo Genna, director of the Italian ISP association AIIP, and Euroispa. I have also had second-hand confirmation from sources close to the European Parliament.
The Medina report called for a range of measures in support of copyright enforcement, including increased liability for ISPs, secondary liability for peer-to-peer sites, and graduated response. It contained amendments calling for stronger 'protection of copyright' put forward by, among others, the wife of the CEO of Vivendi, Janelly Fourtou .
- Article Views: 11935
IPtegrity politics
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Not a blank cheque: European Parliament consents to EU-UK Agreement
- UK border safety alert - mind the capability gap
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
- Copyright-style website blocking orders slipped into Online Safety Bill
- 2 billion cost to British businesses for Online Safety Bill