Meet the new EU Commissioners for copyright
-
Author: Monica Horten
-
Published: 11 January 2010
The proposed new European Commissioners will be questioned by the European Parliament this week. Amazingly, there are four who will have some form of responsibility for policy related to copyright and the Internet. What should the Parliament be asking about? Let's meet them...
***Watch Viviane Reding being questioned live! ***
Viviane Reding
Commissioner-designate, Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
As Commissioner for Information Society, Viviane Reding has done a 360 U-turn from supporting graduated response/3-strikes measures, to supporting the fundamental rights of Internet users. On her watch, the so-called ‘copyright hooks' were mysteriously inserted into the Telecoms Package. Also on her watch, a policy for a Europe-wide 3-strikes began to be formulated, although it has since taken a back seat (and hopefully been put on a very dusty back shelf).
In her statement at the end of the Telecoms Package negotiations on 5 November 2009, she said " a 3-strikes law which would cut people off the Internet without a prior procedure will certainly not become part of European law".
She will be questioned by the Civil Liberties and the Womens Rights committees and Sharon Bowles, chair of the Legal Affairs committee.
Neelie Kroes
Commissioner-designate, Digital Agenda
Neelie Kroes must have been a big Rolling Stones fan, because as Commissioner for Competition, she appeared delighted to be photographed with Mick Jagger at a round-table on copyright. Her round-table also included other venerables of old industry, such as the head of LVMH, makers of Louis Vuitton, who are noted for their lack of sympathy towards the Internet and its users.
We have higher hopes for her, if she is succesful in getting the Information Society portfolio. Net neutrality has been put onto her agenda by the European Parliament.
She will grilled by the ITRE (Industry) committee.
Michel Barnier
Commissioner-designate, Internal Market and Services
Michel Barnier is unknown to Brussels, but the fact that he is French and appointed by President Nicholas Sarkozy should tell us something about his likely attitude to copyright matters. As Internal Market Commissioner he will hold the portfolio for copyright and for the new IPR Enforcement Observatory. His DG has begun to hold an annual conference on IPR Enforcement, where pro-copyright MEPs cosy up to the likes of the IFPI.
We must not let him forget that the real solution to the copyright online issue lies in his hands, and it is to sort the collecting societies and enable multi-territory rights for Internet publication.
He will answer questions from Arlene McCarthy, chair of the Monetary Affairs ( ECON) committee, and Malcolm Harbour, chair of the Internal Market (IMCO) committee.
Karel de Grucht
Commissioner-designate, Trade
Karel de Grucht, is a Belgian politician and a lawyer. He has published an article entitled "No man is an island - On democracy, liberty and human rights", and therefore creates expectations that he will protect the fundamental rights of European citizens. This will concern him in respect of the ACTA dossier which he will be taking over from Baroness Ashton. ACTA - Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement - seeks to get a global agreement on 3-strikes measures and secondary liability for ISPs in relation to copyright and has many implications for fundamental rights.
His interrogators will be the International Trade committee.
La Quadrature du Net has put forward some questions for all of them, across a range of issues from ACTA and WIPO, and copyright term extension, to net neutrality, Internet blocking and fundamental rights.
MEPs should certainly ask about how they propose to implement the divergent EU policies which on the one hand would block the Internet and are pushing for ever tougher measures against Internet users, with the policy which put the Digital Economy at the forefront of the financial recovery.
Full details of the Commissioners-designate are on the European Parliament website.
The hearings will available via webcast , starting tomorrow.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2010) Meet the new EU Commissioners for Copyright
, http://www.iptegrity.com 12 January 2010 .
-
Article Views: 10930
IPtegrity politics
- Social media ban for kids: simple message, tough choices
- How could they ban X?
- Grok AI images: can compliance be enforced?
- AI and copyright – an author’s viewpoint
- UK climb-down over Apple back-door was foreseeable
- Copyright wars 3.0: the AI challenge
- Why would the UK take on Apple?
- What's influencing tech policy in 2025?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy analyst: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Social media ban for kids: simple message, tough choices
- How could they ban X?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
