Berlin: 25,000 march for 'Net freedom
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 15 September 2009
Germans protest against data retention, and plans by the German families Minister for Internet filtering to 'protect the children'. In a separate move, the German government has held talks on ISP 'co-operation' on copyright enforcement.
On September 12, 25,000 people joined the Freedom not Fear march against surveillance and Internet filtering in Berlin. Timed just before the general election on 29 September, the march highlights the efforts of the German government, and in particular of the families minister, Ursula Von der Leyen, to put in controls on the Internet.
The Germans call it 'Internet Sperrung' - Internet lock-up - and some groups fear that plans already underway for Internet filtering to
'protect the children' could be escalated into a total 'infrastructure for Internet control'. But the draft law remains secret.
There were also secret talks on copyright 'cooperation' held over the summer. Following the pattern of the UK and France, the German Industry Minstry held talks with the copyright and Internet industries, but ignored any civic representation. The existence of the talks emerged in a leaked document posted on wikileaks, which outlined the agenda and some of the participants. The outcome of the first meeting is recorded in this document.
As has emerged in the EU political debate, 'cooperation' means that the rights-holder industries want to impose liability on the ISPs, in the form of 3-strikes measures and filtering, and it is unlikely that they have a different agenda in Germany. The leaked document reflects similar positions to those seen in the EU, France and the UK, with right-holders demanding action from the ISPs, and the ISPs telling the rights-holders to change their business model. One interesting point in the leaked document is the German publishing house Burda, which makes a stand in favour of net neutrality.
Until news of the copyright talks emerged, the main focus for German Internet legislation had been a proposal put forward last April for a law to filter the net for child pornography. The Minister responsible was the Families Minister, Ursula Von der Leyen, who has been given the nickname 'Zensursula ' by civil liberties campaigners.
It has now emerged that Frau Von der Leyen has given herself a wider brief, and wants to put measures in place to control the entire Internet. In a news report in the Hamburg Abendbaltt , she is quoted as saying 'we will have a wider discussion, how we protect freedom of thought, democracy, and human dignity in the Internet at the right level.. Otherwise the Internet threatens to become a rights-free chaos-space, in which people can mob, hurt and betray without limit".
The Arbeitskreis gegen Internet Sperren und Zensur (AK Zensur for short), an NGO group which opposes Internet filtering, says that she is not just interested in dealing with child pornography, but wants an 'all-embracing infrastructure for Internet control'. According to AK Zensur, her emphasis appears to be not on upholding rights, but on clamping down.
Frau Von der Leyen has denied that this is her aim.
Last Saturday's demonstration was co-ordinated by AK Vorrat , which opposes surveillance and data retention. AK Zensur was a participating NGO.
Background on German Internet censorship in English.
A secretly recorded speech by Frau Von der Leyen on wikileaks
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2009) Berlin: 25,000 march for 'Net freedom, http://www.iptegrity.com 15September 2009.
- Article Views: 9277
IPtegrity politics
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Not a blank cheque: European Parliament consents to EU-UK Agreement
- UK border safety alert - mind the capability gap
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
- Copyright-style website blocking orders slipped into Online Safety Bill
- 2 billion cost to British businesses for Online Safety Bill