French ISP 'Free' risks fine over refusal to send 3-strikes emails
-
Author: Monica Horten
-
Published: 08 October 2010
The French ISP ‘Free' is being accused by the rights-holders of an ‘unacceptable failure to co-operate' as it backs out of sending the first 3-strikes warning emails issued by the Hadopi..
‘The French law implementing 3-strikes/graduated response measures - also known as the Hadopi law - is being challenged before it has even got off the ground as the ISP ‘Free' backs out of an agreement and refuses to forward the warning emails to subscribers.
Free decided on Monday this week that it would not transmit the warning emails, which are the first stage of the 3-strikes process under French law. This appears to be a reversal of an agreement which it is understood was made with the French Culture
Ministry, according to a report in the French technology website, Numerama . Under this agreement, it is believed that all the French ISPs, including Free, had agreed to co-operate with the 3-strikes process.
The Minister, Frédéric Mitterand, has been angered by Free's reversal. Mitterand has condemned Free's decision and has threatened to issue a decree which will enable a fine to be imposed, as reported by both Numerama and PC Inpact .
The issue appears to be that the law has put in place a fine for ISPs who do not provide user contact details to the Hadopi, but has no fine for ISPs who fail to transmit the emails. Hence the need for a decree to impose the fine on Free. The Hadopi - the public authority which oversees the law - could install its own mail servers and send the emails itself, but has so far failed to do so, relying instead on the ISPs to do use their servers.
‘Free's unco-operative attitude has given the rights-holders cause to pressure harder on the government. The French recorded music industry (SNEP) has called Free's refusal ‘deplorable, and accused Free of recruiting users who commit acts of piracy.
The SNEP also accuses Free of creating distortions of competition to the detriment of other ISPs who respect the law.
This is interesting because, if anything, Free is surely breaking away from a State-sponsored cartel. The SNEP accusation belies any attempt by the regulatory authorities to promote a competitive environment where users can switch if they are not happy.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2010) French ISP Free risks fine over refusal to send 3-strikes emails http://www.iptegrity.com 7 October 2010
-
Article Views: 12062
IPtegrity politics
- Social media ban for kids: simple message, tough choices
- How could they ban X?
- Grok AI images: can compliance be enforced?
- AI and copyright – an author’s viewpoint
- UK climb-down over Apple back-door was foreseeable
- Copyright wars 3.0: the AI challenge
- Why would the UK take on Apple?
- What's influencing tech policy in 2025?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy analyst: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Social media ban for kids: simple message, tough choices
- How could they ban X?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
