French LOPPSI law threatens net filtering
-
Author: Monica Horten
-
Published: 11 February 2010
Will a new law for ‘national security' herald the introduction of Internet filtering in France?
Don't be fooled by the cute name - the LOPPSI (Loi d'Orientation et de Programmation pour la Sécurité Intérieure) is a new French law for national security, which, among other things, seeks to introduce filtering of the Internet. The law has been debated this week in the French Parliament ( Assemblée Générale). It will initially require ISPs to block access to websites on a government-compiled list for the specific purpose of 'protecting children', but many commentators believe that the government plan to implement it more widely.
The critical provision in the LOPPSI was Article 4, which seeks to permit the blocking of websites deemed to contain child pornography. The Article has provoked
heated debate in the French Parliament, with the opposition highlighting how it will fail to deal with its stated objective, and will instead open a back door for others who would like the Internet filtered.
According to an article in Le Monde, the opposition accused the government of ‘diabolisation' of the Internet, " because it is the only medium you cannot control" (Opposition Deputé Martine Billard, who also opposed the Hadopi law, quoted in Le Monde).
Le Monde reports that the government did accept an amendment requiring a judicial endorsment before blocks can be put in place. However, La Quadrature du Net reports that opposition amendments to make it a temporary ‘experimental' measure until the effect could be gauged, were rejected.
Liberation reports that the government has been trying to introduce a system of Internet filtering for the purpose of ‘protecting children' for some time.
But much of the commentary believes that this is a ruse to introduce filtering for purposes such as copyright enforcement.
Such fears are far from unfounded, indeed they are validated by no less than President Sarkozy himself, who seems to have developed a habit of interfering in Internet legal matters.
In a speech on 7 January this year, President Sarkozy said that in addition to the 3-strikes /graduated response system which is now officially in place, "the Hadopi must develop more modern solutions to protect creative works, and to hold a vigil and permanent dialogue with the actors of the web. The more we can automatically de-pollute the networks and the servers of all sources of piracy, the les it will be necessary to take measures against the Internet users. We must therefore experiment without delay with filtering measures."
Of course, the legally-challenged President may need to be reminded that mandatory Internet filtering would clearly be in breach of EU law, and he could be in for another confrontation with the new Commissioner for Fundamental Rights, Madame Reding.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2009) French LOPPSI law threatens net filtering , http://www.iptegrity.com 9 February 2010 .
-
Article Views: 11487
IPtegrity politics
- Social media ban for kids: simple message, tough choices
- How could they ban X?
- Grok AI images: can compliance be enforced?
- AI and copyright – an author’s viewpoint
- UK climb-down over Apple back-door was foreseeable
- Copyright wars 3.0: the AI challenge
- Why would the UK take on Apple?
- What's influencing tech policy in 2025?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy analyst: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Social media ban for kids: simple message, tough choices
- How could they ban X?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
