Skip to main content

France

In 2008 when this website was first set up and I was in  researching my PhD, a policy initiative in France on copyright enforcement found its way into a draft EU law on telecoms. It seemed like an odd move, but it is isn't when one understands the measures that were being proposed.

This was the very first political battle over online content, the first of many to come. The substantive debate moved on, the measures evolved, but the underlying arguments remain much the same.  In this regard, I like to think that I have written the back story to todays debates over tackling all kinds of content on online platforms. From terrorism to sexual abuse, harassment, eating disorders, violence against women, suicide - there is now a very long list of content types that are put forward for policy intervention. The measures proposed will use technology in ways that engage - and very likely put at risk - human rights.

So this section is the blog that I wrote from 2008. It mostly addresses the Creation and Internet law, also known as the Hadopi law. 

It is also written up in my books and if you are a student looking for a citation, you should reference them. They are in many university libraries: A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms and The Copyright Enforcement Enigma

You may also like my book The Closing of the Net  which positions the story of the Hadopi law in the wider policy context. 

French Loi HADOPI set out copyright sanctions

Monica Horten
Catetory: France
Published: 23 June 2008

A new law, known as the Loi HADOPI after the authority which will oversee the implementation ( the High Authority for the diffusion of content and protection of rights on the Internet) sets out how users may be sanctioned by ISPs on behalf of copyright owners. Information will be passed between them via the HADOPI authority to get around data protection rules. Data retention laws will also be amended to enable the data to be stored for a year and accessed for the purposes of copyright protection.

Users will receive an electronic and a written warning, before being threatened with suspension of their account and ultimately termination (hence 3 strikes and you’re out!’. The electronic warnings will be sent to thousands of users, using an automated system. ISPs will be forced to check a blacklist of terminated users before signing up new customers, and fined if they fail to do so.

And a new Charter for ISPs, which will mandate the filtering of content. Filtering means the ISPs will check for anyone using P2P software and may slow it down or block it. They may also – depending on how it is implemented – be asked to open every packet of data to inspect it for copyrighted content. This would be the equivalent of asking the post office to open every envelope in case it contained copyrighted material.

The law is in draft form and is in the early stages of the French legislative process. 

The rationale for the law is that the French music industry has seen a 50% drop in volume and value over the past five years. France is concerned about the future of its cultural industries, which are importantly economically and culturally. The French cultural industry has collaborated with the Hollywood studios and the IFPI to lobby for copyright enforcement measures.

About Iptegrity

Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy analyst: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users.  Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing.  Former telecoms journalist,  experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg  BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.

Politics & copyright

A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms

'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review