European Council to dump EDPS recommendation
-
Author: Monica Horten
-
Published: 04 November 2008
But it will keep an amendment for processing traffic data in support of graduated response, in the e-Privacy directive.
The European Council review of the e-Privacy directive in the Telecoms Package will dump a proposal for a study on IP addresses from the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS). The proposal was included in the Telecom Package - Universal Service
Directive, Article 18 - in September. It followed concerns raised by the Data Protection Supervisor in relation to various privacy issues and the way they were being addressed in the Telecoms Package. He expressed particular concern about IP addresses and the issue of whether or not they should be regarded as personal data, and an amendment that were then in the Telecoms Package. That amendment attempted to define the circumstances when an IP address is or is not considered to be personal data. The Data Protection Supervisor said in a report that, in view of the complexity of this topic, it should be separately addressed through a study. Following his intervention, an amendment was agreed, which proposed setting up a study to look into the issue.I have had sight of the French Presidency's compromise proposal (but am not in a position to publish it). This particular amendment, is not in the document, and is therefore presumed to be dropped.
Amendment 181 of the Harbour report, which permits the processing of retained traffic data for the purposes of graduated response, remains in the proposal.
-
Article Views: 10200
IPtegrity politics
- Social media ban for kids: simple message, tough choices
- How could they ban X?
- Grok AI images: can compliance be enforced?
- AI and copyright – an author’s viewpoint
- UK climb-down over Apple back-door was foreseeable
- Copyright wars 3.0: the AI challenge
- Why would the UK take on Apple?
- What's influencing tech policy in 2025?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy analyst: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Online Safety
- Social media ban for kids: simple message, tough choices
- How could they ban X?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?