ACTA: EU wants to cut off infringers in new leaked draft
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 24 March 2010
I said in my posting yesterday that Luc Devigne, EU negotiator for ACTA would not be able to keep his promise of ‘no 3 strikes'. Today, that broken promise is already evident in the leaked draft of the full consolidated Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement. Mr Devigne was either being very Spartan with the truth, or he needs to consult an optician.
It will take a long time to complete the analysis of the entire draft, but these two points stand out in respect of ISP liability and the 'possibility' for some kind of 3-strikes regime. Moreover, and of great concern, it appears to additionally provide for the blocking of websites, also under the 'liability' provision.
Section 4 of the consolidated draft discusses measures related to the Internet.
Point 3, of Section 4 discusses instances where the ISPs may be liable or
not liable for copyright.
On page 28, sub-paragraph iii concerning limition of ISP liability. Paraphrasing quite a large chunk of legalese, ISPs may be considered not liable in the following circumstances:
Option 1 [US
An online service provider adopting and reasonably implementing a policy to address the unauthorised storage or transmission of materials protected by copyright
This is referenced to Footnote 29
An example of such policy is providing for the termination in appropriate circumstances of subscriptions [US and] [AUS or} accounts on the service provider's system or network of repeat infringers]
On page 29, Option 2 EU . Paraphrasing, this appears to mean that the EU is asking for a provision which permits users to be cut off the Internet as a sanction for copyright infringement, as well as the blocking of websites as a second form of sanction.
Paragraph 3(a) shall not affect the possibility for a judicial or administrative authority, in accordance with the Parties legal system, requiring a service provider to terminate or prevent an infringement, nor does it affect the possibility of the parties establishing procedures governing the removal or disabling of access to information.
Mr Devigne and his colleagues at DG Trade should understand that this is describing what the rest of the world understands to be a 3-strikes regime.
Download the entire ACTA (Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement) consolidated draft
Michael Geist has some more initial points regarding border searches.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2010) ACTA: EU wants to cut off infringers in new leaked draft
http://www.iptegrity.com 24 March 2010
- Article Views: 8126
IPtegrity politics
- Why would the UK take on Apple?
- What's influencing tech policy in 2025?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?