Conservatives want to get rid of mere conduit
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 06 April 2010
Conservative spokesman on Culture, Jeremy Hunt, said today in the House of Commons that he thinks ISPs should not retain their mere conduit status.
And he wants to open up BT's ducts to competition.
His colleague Peter Luff said would said the freedoms of Internet users should come after creativity.
Derek Wyatt called for licencing of ISPs - which would reverse the Tories policy established in the 1980s.
Jeremy Hunt, Conservative spokesman on culture, wants ISPs to take responsibility for copyrighted content, and to work with the rights-holders. He said " I dont think it is satisfactory to say they are a 'mere conduit".
In saying this, however, Jeremy Hunt, displays ignorance of UK and EU law, and the E-commerce directive. The mere conduit provision is there for a reason, it is intended to provide an open infrastructure which promotes innovation and permits universal communications. Mere conduit
also de facto protects the fundamental rights to freedom of expression and privacy. Mere conduit is an essential measure for the Internet to function. It is quite astonishing that Mr Hunt would indicate that the Conservatives want to get rid of it, which was what was implied by his statement.
Moreover, Mr Hunt wants to open up BT's ducts. This is a major policy choice, and it would normally be intended to promote competition. But, Mr Hunt, there is no point in having competition if all suppliers are asked to block, and to snoop on people's traffic. People do not want a choice of blockages, they want NO blockages.
It is unbelievable that a British politician would say that it is ok to restrict people's freedoms for the sake of a political objective, because that is what the 'creativity' that he speaks of is,
Mr Luff's comments should be referred to the European Commission. They run contrary to European policy. In the Telecoms Package, it was decided that Internet freedoms are important and they are now on the EU policy agenda.
What really amazes me, is that Jeremy Hunt will compete against Richard Mollett, the BPI's head of communications, in his southWest Surrey constituency. He should be opposing his opponent, not giving him a present on a plate - the Digital Economy Bill was written by Mollett and his colleagues, and they will be the key beneficiaries.
The Conservatives obviously cannot be trusted on Internet issues.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial-Share Alike 2.5 UK:England and Wales License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ It may be used for non-commercial purposes only, and the author's name should be attributed. The correct attribution for this article is: Monica Horten (2010) Conservatives want to get rid of mere conduit http://www.iptegrity.com 6 April 2010
- Article Views: 11694
IPtegrity politics
- Shadow bans: EU law says users may not be left in the dark
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Not a blank cheque: European Parliament consents to EU-UK Agreement
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Shadow bans: EU law says users may not be left in the dark
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
- Copyright-style website blocking orders slipped into Online Safety Bill