Ofcom's DE Act 2014 plan requires compliant Parliament
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 23 July 2012
Will the Digital Economy Act copyright measures be in place by 2014?
That is the current plan of the industry-friendly UK telecoms regulator Ofcom. In its consultation issued , Ofcom is proposing a tight schedule to get the measures in place. From what can be seen, the schedule relies on a smooth path through the various approvals that have to be given before Ofcom can give industry the go-ahead. That means that the European Commission will have to give the measures the all-clear by late November, and Parliament itself will have to
follow the Commission, without any questions.
Ofcom plans to have the first notices sent by ISPs to subscribers alleged to have infringed copyright by early 2014. Working backwards, the ISPs apparently need 9 months to get their systems in place, followed by a short period of testing. Coincidentally, the appeals systems also need 9 months. That means, the approvals have to be obtained by January 2013, so the ISPs can be given the starting signal in Febuary.
Of course, all of these timings can be questioned, but they are what Ofcom has stated.
For the approvals to be in place, the measures must be sent to the European Commission in September. This means that the team at Ofcom will spend the summer analysing the responses - at least, that is what we would expect them to do if they are professional. They are supposed to revise the code according the responses before they send it to the European Commission.
If Ofcom are to meet their own schedule, they will have no time for summer holidays - unless of course, they have already decided what they will send to the Commission and if that were to be the case, it would be a waste of time for anyone to respond to the consultation.
Ofcom is relying on the Commission sending back a tick-box approval by the end of November 2012. When it has that approval, it may lay the measures before Parliament. The measures will go in as secondary legislation. Parliament has the power to annul them, but not to amend.
Ofcom plans to put the secondary legislation before Parliament in December, or at the very latest, January 2013. However, January would be pushing it very tight on the schedule, so I would expect that Ofcom is really aiming at December.
Secondary legislation usually flies in and out of Parliament without anyone noticing. It is intended for simple updates such as amending a figure or clarifying something that has already been agreed. It is not intended for detailed, complex and controversial measures such as those in the Digital Economy Act.
Luckily, there is a Secondary Legislation Scrutiny committee that will look at the draft measures. It has already issued a critical report of the draft Costs SI that was laid before Parliament this month. See Did Ministry breach procedure in DE Act costs order?
Ofcom is obviously expecting another compliant tick-box exercise from the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny committee. It needs that in order to be ready to give industry the starting signal in February.
Of course, the Westminster Parliament is no so compliant any more. After the expenses scandal it has tried to clean up its act and to question both industry and civil servants. The Ofcom copyright infringement measures are so complex and the documentation is quite confusing, so it would be frankly astonishing if Parliament did not wish to raise queries. Whether you are for or against the measures, the Ofcom Code, as it is known, is poorly drafted as a piece of legislation.
It will be all eyes on the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny committee in December.
---
Here is the Ofcom consultation on the Digital Economy Act and copyright infringement measures:
Online Infringement of Copyright and the Digital Economy Act 2010 : Notice of Ofcom's proposal to make by order a code for regulating the initial obligations
This is an original article from Iptegrity.com. You may re-publish it under a Creative Commons licence, but you should cite my name and provide a link back to iptegrity.com. Media and Academics - please cite as Monica Horten, Ofcom plan for DE Act 2014 requires compliant Parliament , in www.iptegrity.com, 23th July 2012 . Commercial users - please contact me.
- Article Views: 15785
IPtegrity politics
- UK climb-down over Apple back-door was foreseeable
- Copyright wars 3.0: the AI challenge
- Why would the UK take on Apple?
- What's influencing tech policy in 2025?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
