EU-Canada Trade Agreement - copyright enforcement via the cat-flap?
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 11 October 2012
How could an EU-Canada Trade Agreement change copyright law?
An alert has been issued over the possible inclusion of copyright enforcment measures - and in particular, of criminal sanctions - in a new EU- Canada Trade Agreement (CETA). It is understood that the proposed criminal measures could be similar to those in the Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA).
The EU- Canada Trade Agreement (CETA) is one of series of free trade agreements being negotiated by the European Union. That copyright measures are in the EU- Canada Trade Agreement has been known for some time. Indeed, the Commission has been presenting this fact since 2010.
What has not been known is the exact nature of the measures under negotiation. Now, the French citizens advocacy group, La Quadrature du Net, reveals that ACTA-like provisions could be on the table.
According to La Quadrature du Net, there was a workshop on the EU- Canada Trade Agreement on 10 October. Speaking at the workshop, the EU lead negotiator is reported to have confirmed the existence of criminal copyright sanctions in a current draft of the agreement.
He added that the criminal provisions in CETA were not being negotiated by the European Commission, but instead they were being handled by the Member States. This would seem to reflect the procedure during the ACTA negotiations.
It is not known whether any other ACTA-like measures are under discussion.
It's also not clear what the real significance is. A Free Trade Agreement would usually be ratified by the EU and the Member States, and its provisions effectively become law. Where that entails rights to import/export specific goods, that is one thing. Imposing criminal sanctions under copyright law, is quite another.
Is is possible for a trade agreement with a third-party country to include measures that requre changes to the criminal code? La Quadrature du Net thinks it does, and has accused the EU of trying to bring in ACTA measures by the CETA backdoor.
But on the scale of international copyright politics, the EU- Canada Trade Agreement is really quite small. So maybe not the back-door. More like the cat-flap.
This is an original article from Iptegrity.com. If you refer to it or to its content, you should cite my name as the author, and provide a link back to iptegrity.com. Media and Academics - please cite as Monica Horten, EU-Canada Trade Agreement - copyright enforcement via the cat-flap? , in www.iptegrity.com, 11 October 2012 . Commercial users - please contact me.
- Article Views: 14357
IPtegrity politics
- UK climb-down over Apple back-door was foreseeable
- Copyright wars 3.0: the AI challenge
- Why would the UK take on Apple?
- What's influencing tech policy in 2025?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
