France votes in 3-strikes law
- Author: Monica Horten
- Published: 03 April 2009
3-strikes law is passed by the French Parliament in late night session. Opposition arguments failed to change its course, and alternative sanctions were squashed. 1000 people a day are expected to be cut off the Internet under the new law.
At around 11pm last night, the French Assemblee Nationale voted in favour of the Creation and Internet law . This is the law that will bring in graduated response or 3-strikes measures to clamp down on peer-to-peer filesharing and the uploading of music and television videos onto websites such as You Tube. According to French news reports, only 16 Parliamentarians were present for the vote, which
came after five full days, and around 40 hours of debate, split over two sessions in March and April.
The opposition put up a good fight, and indeed, I was watching some of the debate on a webcast, and they were well versed in the arguments against the law. They questioned the Minister, Christine Albanel, and her young malerapporteur, Franck Riester, in great technical detail. They questioned the principles of sanctioning users for downloading, as well as the functioning of the Hadopi - the public authority which is supposed to oversee the law. The argued that the law is unworkable, and that users will get around it, in spite of the excessive controls that have been built into it. The Hadopi is expected to order 10000 emails, 3000 registered letters and 1000 people to be cut off the Internet, every day. The transmission of the emails and the letters will be carried out by the Internet service providers ( broadband providers), who will also be responsible for cutting off their own customers.
Read the report in Liberation.
Click here for the text of the Creation and Internet law , as voted, (French only).- Article Views: 10353
IPtegrity politics
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Creation of deep fakes to be criminal offence under new law
- AI and tech: Asks for the new government
- How WhatsApp holds structural power
- Meta rolls out encryption as political headwinds ease
- EU law set for new course on child online safety
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- MEPs reach political agreement to protect children and privacy
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Not a blank cheque: European Parliament consents to EU-UK Agreement
- UK border safety alert - mind the capability gap
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy advisor: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
- Online Safety Bill: One rule for them and another for us
- Online Safety Bill - Freedom to interfere?
- Copyright-style website blocking orders slipped into Online Safety Bill
- 2 billion cost to British businesses for Online Safety Bill