French Hadopi law defeated in surprise vote
-
Author: Monica Horten
-
Published: 12 April 2009
"Le texte est rejete!"
The French government's Hadopi law to ban file-sharing by cutting people off the Internet has been defeated in a surprise victory for the opposition parties against the ruling Sarkozy regime.
Last Thursday, the law - correctly called the Creation and Internet law - was put to a second vote in the Assemblee
Generale. French Internet campaigners, and the French media who have followed the progress of the law, were ecstatic as the speaker pronounced "le texte est rejete" !
"Alléluia ! C'est un miracle parlementaire ! " said Christian Paul, one of the opposition Parlementarians who had spoken against the law in the debates. " Le Titanic a coulé ! " said the centrist member Jean Dionis du Séjour, who voted with the opposition ( as reported in Liberation ).
The French MEP Guy Bono called it a ‘democratic somersault' and a victory for citizens who fought to preserve democratic values'. Bono linked it to the Telecoms Package process in the European Parliament, suggesting that the Parliament has not yet given in to the pressure from the French government in respect of the user safeguards Amendment 138.
" Ce rejet est une formidable victoire contre la volonté du gouvernement de contrôler Internet, et sur sa politique en la matièr" said Jérémie Zimmermann, of La Quadrature du Net .
But the Rapporteur, Franck Riester, was clearly angry, blaming the opposition for manipulating the situation to create the rejection: "Je suis en colère. Nous avons été victimes d'une manipulation grossière, d'une obstruction bête et méchante des socialistes avec lesquels nous avions pourtant eu un débat sur le fond lors de l'examen du texte."
The composers' collecting society, the SACEM, was unsurprisinly annoyed too: "Ce vote aussi inattendu qu'incompréhensible rappelle un épisode que l'on n'imaginait pas se reproduire à l'issue d'un processus de travail de plus de dix-huit mois..."
The Creation and Internet law sought to bring in a regime for enforcing copyright on the Internet by a series of warnings followed by suspension of Internet access, overseen by a quasi-public authority to be called the Hadopi - hence it is also referred to as the Hadopi law. It was supplemented by draconian measures such as blacklists which were designed to close all the loop-holes against people who would download a copyrighted file.
The vote was the second one by the Assemblee Generale, and would normally be just a formality. The opposition victory was unexpected. The Minister, Christine Albanel, has already said she intends to re-table it, and will resign if it doesn't happen. Liberation states she wants to bring it back as soon as 27 April. Technically, this can be done, however, the opposition spokesman Christian Paul is quoted in Liberation saying that he has been a member of Parliament for 12 years, and has never seen it happen.
So we wait and see whether Hadopi has a second life.
-
Article Views: 12049
IPtegrity politics
- Social media ban for kids: simple message, tough choices
- How could they ban X?
- Grok AI images: can compliance be enforced?
- AI and copyright – an author’s viewpoint
- UK climb-down over Apple back-door was foreseeable
- Copyright wars 3.0: the AI challenge
- Why would the UK take on Apple?
- What's influencing tech policy in 2025?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- EU at loggerheads over chat control
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Whatever happened to the AI Bill?
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- EU puts chat control on back burner
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
About Iptegrity
Iptegrity.com is the website of Dr Monica Horten, independent policy analyst: online safety, technology and human rights. Advocating to protect the rights of the majority of law abiding citizens online. Independent expert on the Council of Europe Committee of Experts on online safety and empowerment of content creators and users. Published author, and post-doctoral scholar, with a PhD from the University of Westminster, and a DipM from the Chartered Institute of Marketing. Former telecoms journalist, experienced panelist and Chair, cited in the media eg BBC, iNews, Times, Guardian and Politico.
Politics & copyright
A Copyright Masquerade: How Corporate Lobbying Threatens Online Freedoms
'timely and provocative' Entertainment Law Review
Online Safety
- Social media ban for kids: simple message, tough choices
- How could they ban X?
- Online Safety and the Westminster honey trap
- Shadow bans: EU and UK diverge on user redress
- Why the Online Safety Act is not fit for purpose
- Fixing the human rights failings in the Online Safety Act
- Hidden effects of the UK Online Safety Act
- Why did X lock my account for not providing my birthday?
- Online Safety Act: Ofcom’s 1700-pages of tech platform rules
- Online Safety - a non-consensual Act
- Online Safety Bill passes as US court blocks age-checks law
- Online Safety Bill: ray of hope for free speech
- National Crime Agency to run new small boats social media centre
- Online Safety Bill: does government want to snoop on your WhatsApps?
- What is content of democratic importance?
